OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the value in the prediction of spontaneous preterm delivery of ultrasonographically measured cervical length measured between 14 and 24 weeks' gestation. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study examined cervical length by means of a two-stage procedure, transabdominal ultrasonography followed by transvaginal ultrasonography if cervical length was <30 mm. RESULTS: A total of 6877 patients met inclusion criteria. Mean cervical length was 37.5 mm. Odds ratios for early preterm delivery (< or =32 weeks' gestation) for patients with cervical lengths < or =10, < or =15, < or = 20, < or =25, and < or =30 mm were, respectively, 29.3 (95% confidence interval, 11.3-75.8), 24.3 (95% confidence interval, 12. 9-45.9), 18.3 (95% confidence interval, 10.8-31.0), 13.4 (95% confidence interval, 8.8-20.6), and 3.2 (95% confidence interval, 2. 4-4.4). For early preterm delivery a cervical length of < or =15 mm had a positive predictive value of 47.6%, a negative predictive value of 96.7%, a sensitivity of 8.2%, and a specificity of 99.7%. CONCLUSIONS: A short cervix seen on a second-trimester sonogram was a powerful predictor of early spontaneous preterm delivery (< or =32 weeks' gestation). Nearly 50% of patients with a cervical length < or =15 mm had an early spontaneous preterm delivery, which suggests that clinical trials of interventions (eg, cerclage) in this population are urgently needed.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the value in the prediction of spontaneous preterm delivery of ultrasonographically measured cervical length measured between 14 and 24 weeks' gestation. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study examined cervical length by means of a two-stage procedure, transabdominal ultrasonography followed by transvaginal ultrasonography if cervical length was <30 mm. RESULTS: A total of 6877 patients met inclusion criteria. Mean cervical length was 37.5 mm. Odds ratios for early preterm delivery (< or =32 weeks' gestation) for patients with cervical lengths < or =10, < or =15, < or = 20, < or =25, and < or =30 mm were, respectively, 29.3 (95% confidence interval, 11.3-75.8), 24.3 (95% confidence interval, 12. 9-45.9), 18.3 (95% confidence interval, 10.8-31.0), 13.4 (95% confidence interval, 8.8-20.6), and 3.2 (95% confidence interval, 2. 4-4.4). For early preterm delivery a cervical length of < or =15 mm had a positive predictive value of 47.6%, a negative predictive value of 96.7%, a sensitivity of 8.2%, and a specificity of 99.7%. CONCLUSIONS: A short cervix seen on a second-trimester sonogram was a powerful predictor of early spontaneous preterm delivery (< or =32 weeks' gestation). Nearly 50% of patients with a cervical length < or =15 mm had an early spontaneous preterm delivery, which suggests that clinical trials of interventions (eg, cerclage) in this population are urgently needed.
Authors: Ronald F Lamont; Chia-Ling Nhan-Chang; Jack D Sobel; Kimberly Workowski; Agustin Conde-Agudelo; Roberto Romero Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2011-04-02 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: E Vaisbuch; R Romero; O Erez; J P Kusanovic; S Mazaki-Tovi; F Gotsch; V Romero; C Ward; T Chaiworapongsa; P Mittal; Y Sorokin; S S Hassan Journal: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 7.299
Authors: Jose Galaz; Roberto Romero; Yi Xu; Derek Miller; Dustyn Levenson; Robert Para; Aneesha Varrey; Richard Hsu; Anna Tong; Sonia S Hassan; Chaur-Dong Hsu; Nardhy Gomez-Lopez Journal: J Perinat Med Date: 2020-09-25 Impact factor: 1.901
Authors: Roberto Romero; Kypros Nicolaides; Agustin Conde-Agudelo; Ann Tabor; John M O'Brien; Elcin Cetingoz; Eduardo Da Fonseca; George W Creasy; Katharina Klein; Line Rode; Priya Soma-Pillay; Shalini Fusey; Cetin Cam; Zarko Alfirevic; Sonia S Hassan Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2011-12-11 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: J P Kusanovic; J Espinoza; R Romero; L F Gonçalves; J K Nien; E Soto; N Khalek; N Camacho; I Hendler; P Mittal; L A Friel; F Gotsch; O Erez; N G Than; S Mazaki-Tovi; M L Schoen; S S Hassan Journal: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol Date: 2007-10 Impact factor: 7.299