Literature DB >> 10868308

Pediatric pharmacodynamics of midazolam oral syrup. Pediatric Pharmacology Research Unit Network.

J Marshall1, A Rodarte, J Blumer, K C Khoo, B Akbari, G Kearns.   

Abstract

In this study, the authors evaluate the pharmacodynamics, safety, and acceptability of a new cherry-flavored oral syrup formulation of midazolam. This randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, dose-ranging clinical trial of oral midazolam was conducted at seven U.S. health care institutions focused on pediatric clinical pharmacology research (i.e., the PPRU Network). Pediatric patients (n = 85, ages 6 months through 15 years) underwent invasive procedures and were randomized to a single oral dose of midazolam syrup (0.25, 0.5, or 1.0 mg/kg). Patient taste acceptability of midazolam syrup was evaluated at the time of oral administration. Pharmacodynamic measurements included (1) sedation score using a 5-point scale at baseline and 10-, 20-, and 30-minute postdose intervals and (2) anxiety score using a 4-point scale at the time of separation from caretakers and, when applicable, at the time of mask anesthetic induction. Midazolam and alpha-hydroxymidazolam plasma concentrations were measured at all pharmacodynamic measurement time points. Adverse events were monitored continuously during the study. Most patients (99%) accepted the syrup without difficulty. Satisfactory sedation was achieved within 30 minutes by 81% of patients. The anxiety score at the time of caretaker separation and mask anesthetic induction was satisfactory for 87% and 91% of patients, respectively. A significant linear relationship between plasma drug concentration and maximal sedation score, but not anxiety score, was observed. The occurrence of adverse events was consistent with the known safety profile of midazolam. The most commonly reported adverse events were hiccoughing, hypoxemia, nausea, and emesis. It was concluded that a new oral syrup formulation of midazolam, 0.25 to 1.0 mg/kg, effectively induced rapid-onset, dose-related, adequate, and safe sedation and anxiolysis in pediatric patients who underwent operative procedures. Sedative effects were related to plasma concentrations of both midazolam and the primary metabolite, alpha-hydroxymidazolam. Oral midazolam, 1.0 mg/kg, administered within 30 minutes of the expected procedure or anesthetic induction should provide safe and effective sedation to a majority of children ages 6 months to 16 years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10868308

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0091-2700            Impact factor:   3.126


  11 in total

1.  Inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase activity in paediatrics: age-related regulation and response to mycophenolic acid.

Authors:  A Rother; P Glander; E Vitt; D Czock; N von Ahsen; V W Armstrong; M Oellerich; K Budde; R Feneberg; B Tönshoff; L T Weber
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 2.953

2.  A prospective study of 2 sedation regimens in children: chloral hydrate, meperidine, and hydroxyzine versus midazolam, meperidine, and hydroxyzine.

Authors:  Marianne M Sheroan; Diane C Dilley; Warner J Lucas; William F Vann
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2006

3.  Pharmacogenomics in Children.

Authors:  Michael J Rieder; Abdelbaset A Elzagallaai
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

4.  Sedation and analgesia in children with developmental disabilities and neurologic disorders.

Authors:  Todd J Kilbaugh; Stuart H Friess; Ramesh Raghupathi; Jimmy W Huh
Journal:  Int J Pediatr       Date:  2010-07-20

5.  Pharmacodynamics of intravenous and oral midazolam in preterm infants.

Authors:  Saskia N de Wildt; Gregory L Kearns; Sintha D Sie; Wim C J Hop; John N van den Anker
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 6.  Developmental changes in the expression and function of cytochrome P450 3A isoforms: evidence from in vitro and in vivo investigations.

Authors:  Ibrahim Ince; Catherijne A J Knibbe; Meindert Danhof; Saskia N de Wildt
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 6.447

7.  Is premedication with midazolam more effective by the sublingual than the oral route?

Authors:  Shobhana Gupta; Hina Gadani; Shravan Kedia
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2011 Jan-Jun

8.  Comparison between dexmedetomidine and midazolam premedication in pediatric patients undergoing ophthalmic day-care surgeries.

Authors:  Shailesh Bhadla; Deepal Prajapati; Thaju Louis; Garima Puri; Saurin Panchal; Mayur Bhuva
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2013 May-Aug

Review 9.  Premedication with dexmedetomidine in pediatric patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ke Peng; Shao-ru Wu; Fu-hai Ji; Jian Li
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 2.365

10.  Oral medicine acceptance in infants and toddlers: measurement properties of the caregiver-administered Children's acceptance tool (CareCAT).

Authors:  Joern Blume; Ana Lorena Ruano; Siri Wang; Debra J Jackson; Thorkild Tylleskär; Liv Inger Strand
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 2.125

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.