Literature DB >> 10868307

Drug labeling and risk perceptions of teratogenicity: a survey of pregnant Canadian women and their health professionals.

M Pole1, A Einarson, N Pairaudeau, T Einarson, G Koren.   

Abstract

There is a general perception that medicinal drugs are not safe in pregnancy despite the fact that fewer than 30 drugs have been shown to cause major malformations in humans. A large number of women need medications in pregnancy to treat pregnancy-induced conditions, acute illnesses, and chronic diseases. The objectives of this study were the following: (1) to characterize the perception of teratogenic risk by pregnant women and their partners and by health professionals and (2) to examine the most reassuring way to present data on a drug for nausea and vomiting of pregnancy that has been proven to be safe to the fetus. A convenience sample of pregnant Canadian women and their partners, pharmacists, nurses, physicians, and hospital workers were asked to choose the "safest" among four drugs by statements describing their safety. Although the text of all four was similar, the title and narrative were modified to be more or less "reassuring" by the use of more or less terms such as malformations and abnormalities. Health professionals rated the teratogenic risk significantly lower than the parents, but even they rated the drugs as not safe, despite a scientifically reassuring text. Sixty percent of the 240 participants, regardless of their perception of teratogenic risk, believed the four drugs were of similar risks. However, in the other 40%, the less "reassuring" text led to higher teratogenic perception, and the more reassuring options tended to decrease the false perception of teratogenic risk. It was concluded that in general, four different versions of reassuring text describing a scientifically proven safe drug in pregnancy did not lead expecting parents to believe they were safe. Among those who did not rank the four drugs as having equal safety/risk, the less "reassuring" text led to a higher perception of teratogenic risk. Even health professionals reading the labels describing safe drugs rated them as unsafe. Presently, the perception of teratogenic risk is strong even for safe drugs and is difficult to change even with evidence-based facts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10868307

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0091-2700            Impact factor:   3.126


  11 in total

1.  Drug use in pregnancy--physicians' evaluation of quality and clinical impact of drug information centres.

Authors:  Sofia Kristina Frost Widnes; Jan Schjøtt
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2008-12-04       Impact factor: 2.953

2.  Clinical decision support to promote safe prescribing to women of reproductive age: a cluster-randomized trial.

Authors:  Eleanor Bimla Schwarz; Sara M Parisi; Steven M Handler; Gideon Koren; Elan D Cohen; Grant J Shevchik; Gary S Fischer
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Documentation of contraception and pregnancy when prescribing potentially teratogenic medications for reproductive-age women.

Authors:  Eleanor Bimla Schwarz; Debbie A Postlethwaite; Yun-Yi Hung; Mary Anne Armstrong
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2007-09-18       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Teratogenic risk perception and confidence in use of medicines in pairs of pregnant women and general practitioners based on patient information leaflets.

Authors:  Sofia Frost Widnes; Jan Schjøtt; Geir Egil Eide; Anne Gerd Granas
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 5.606

5.  Depression during Pregnancy : Overview of Clinical Factors.

Authors:  Heather A Bennett; Adrienne Einarson; Anna Taddio; Gideon Koren; Thomas R Einarson
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.859

6.  Drug use in pregnancy: Knowledge of drug dispensers and pregnant women in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.

Authors:  Appolinary Kamuhabwa; Rashida Jalal
Journal:  Indian J Pharmacol       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.200

7.  Women's perception of risks of adverse fetal pregnancy outcomes: a large-scale multinational survey.

Authors:  Irene Petersen; Rachel L McCrea; Angela Lupattelli; Hedvig Nordeng
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Perception of drug teratogenicity among general practitioners and specialists in obstetrics/gynecology: a regional and national questionnaire-based survey.

Authors:  Charlotte Gils; Anton Pottegård; Zandra Nymand Ennis; Per Damkier
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  Risks versus benefits of medication use during pregnancy: what do women perceive?

Authors:  Bianca Mulder; Maarten J Bijlsma; Catharina Cm Schuiling-Veninga; Leonard P Morssink; Eugene van Puijenbroek; Jan G Aarnoudse; Eelko Hak; Tjalling W de Vries
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 2.711

10.  Perception of teratogenic and foetotoxic risk by health professionals: a survey in Midi-Pyrenees area.

Authors:  Christine Damase-Michel; Juliette Pichereau; Atul Pathak; Isabelle Lacroix; Jean Louis Montastruc
Journal:  Pharm Pract (Granada)       Date:  2008-03-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.