Literature DB >> 10868070

Exploring the use of qualitative methods in published health services and management research.

T J Hoff1, L C Witt.   

Abstract

There is interest in promoting greater use of qualitative methods in health care research. However, little is known about the volume or characteristics of published studies that use qualitative methods. This article explores these issues through a systematic review of 3 years (1995-1997) of articles classified as research in nine core health services research and management journals. The findings show that only about one in seven published research articles used qualitative methods. Two of the nine journals reviewed contributed 45 percent of the total number of articles using qualitative methods. Four journals contributed a combined 2 percent of this total number. The primary purposes in using these methods are description and articulating stakeholder perspectives. There is no standard number of pages devoted by journals to these studies or evidence that they require more journal space on average than quantitative studies. Most of the studies reviewed presented little or no information on methodology. These findings clarify future areas of emphasis for both editors and researchers wishing to promote the use of qualitative methodology in published health care research.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10868070     DOI: 10.1177/107755870005700201

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care Res Rev        ISSN: 1077-5587            Impact factor:   3.929


  7 in total

1.  Mixed methods studies: a foundation for primary care research.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Borkan
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.166

Review 2.  Use of qualitative methods in published health services and management research: a 10-year review.

Authors:  Bryan J Weiner; Halle R Amick; Jennifer L Lund; Shoou-Yih Daniel Lee; Timothy J Hoff
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2010-07-30       Impact factor: 3.929

3.  Sustainable rural telehealth innovation: a public health case study.

Authors:  Rajendra Singh; Lars Mathiassen; Max E Stachura; Elena V Astapova
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-04-30       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Empirical research in bioethical journals. A quantitative analysis.

Authors:  P Borry; P Schotsmans; K Dierickx
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 5.  Liability implications of physician-directed care coordination.

Authors:  Mark A Hall; Ralph A Peeples; Richard W Lord
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.166

6.  Questionnaire study to gain an insight into the manufacturing and fitting process of artificial eyes in children: an ocularist perspective.

Authors:  Holly Chinnery; Simon B N Thompson; Siamak Noroozi; Bryce Dyer; Karen Rees
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-10-28       Impact factor: 2.031

7.  Beyond exploratory: a tailored framework for designing and assessing qualitative health research.

Authors:  Katharine A Rendle; Corey M Abramson; Sarah B Garrett; Meghan C Halley; Daniel Dohan
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 2.692

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.