Literature DB >> 10867732

The 'cut and push' method of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube removal.

C B Pearce1, P M Goggin, J Collett, L Smith, H D Duncan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The standard method of removing percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes is by gastroscopy. This has implications for endoscopy time and resources, and we believe is not always necessary. Depending on the type of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube used we often used the 'cut and push' method. This involves cutting the catheter at skin level and allowing the tube and internal bumper to spontaneously pass. The cut and push method also represents a considerable resource saving compared to the endoscopic method that we think warrants further discussion.
METHOD: We reviewed all the files of the percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes removed in our unit over the last 4 years.
RESULTS: During the period of July 1995 to July 1999, we have inserted 384 percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes. Seven tubes have been removed endoscopically and 73 tubes have been removed with the cut and push method. Only two possible complications have been recorded (2.7%).
CONCLUSIONS: We believe that we have provided further evidence that percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes can be removed safely using the cut and push method. Patients who are often frail and who have multiple medical problems are saved an often-long journey to the endoscopy unit as well as the hazards of an endoscopy. The saving in resources in what is already an overworked system by not performing endoscopies is also considerable. Copyright 2000 Harcourt Publishers Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10867732     DOI: 10.1054/clnu.2000.0100

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Nutr        ISSN: 0261-5614            Impact factor:   7.324


  7 in total

Review 1.  Enteral feeding. Nasogastric, nasojejunal, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy, or jejunostomy: its indications and limitations.

Authors:  C B Pearce; H D Duncan
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.401

2.  Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) with T-fasteners obviates the need for emergent replacement after early tube dislodgement.

Authors:  P Timratana; K El-Hayek; H Shimizu; M Kroh; B Chand
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: a safe and effective bridge for enteral nutrition in neurological or non-neurological conditions.

Authors:  Rasim Gencosmanoglu
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.210

4.  The 'cut and push' technique: is it really safe?

Authors:  Oliver Peacock; Rajeev Singh; Andrew Cole; William Speake
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2012-07-27

Review 5.  Prevention and management of minor complications in percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy.

Authors:  Kurt Boeykens; Ivo Duysburgh; Wim Verlinden
Journal:  BMJ Open Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-07

6.  Small bowel obstruction caused by intraluminal migration of retained percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy internal bumper.

Authors:  A E Agaba; S S Sarmah; B A Victor Babu; P O Agaba; O Ajayi; M Fayaz; B Ramanand
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 1.891

7.  Comparison of complications between endoscopic and percutaneous replacement of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes.

Authors:  Chang Geun Lee; Hyoun Woo Kang; Yun Jeong Lim; Jun Kyu Lee; Moon-Soo Koh; Jin Ho Lee; Chang Hun Yang; Jae Hak Kim
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 2.153

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.