Literature DB >> 10867715

Diabetes risk score: towards earlier detection of type 2 diabetes in general practice.

S J Griffin1, P S Little, C N Hales, A L Kinmonth, N J Wareham.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetes is common, costly and often goes unrecognised for many years. When patients are diagnosed, the majority exhibit associated tissue damage or established cardiovascular risk. Evidence is accumulating that earlier detection and management of diabetes and related metabolic abnormalities may be beneficial. We aimed to develop and evaluate a score based on routinely collected information to identify people at risk of having undetected diabetes.
METHODS: A population-based sample of 1077 people, aged 40 to 64 years, without known diabetes, from a single Cambridgeshire general practice, underwent clinical assessment including an oral glucose tolerance test. In a separate 12-month study, 41 practices in southern England reported clinical details of patients aged 40 to 64 years with newly diagnosed Type 2 diabetes. A notional population was created by random selection and pooling of half of each dataset. Data were entered into a regression model to produce a formula predicting the risk of diabetes. The performance of this risk score in detecting diabetes was tested in an independent, randomly selected, population-based sample.
RESULTS: Age, gender, body mass index, steroid and antihypertensive medication, family and smoking history contributed to the score. In the test population at 72% specificity, the sensitivity of the score was 77% and likelihood ratio 2.76. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve was 80%.
CONCLUSIONS: A simple score, using only data that are routinely collected in general practice, can help identify those at risk of diabetes. This score could contribute to efficient earlier detection through case-finding or targeted screening. Copyright 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10867715     DOI: 10.1002/1520-7560(200005/06)16:3<164::aid-dmrr103>3.0.co;2-r

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Metab Res Rev        ISSN: 1520-7552            Impact factor:   4.876


  142 in total

Review 1.  Should we screen for type 2 diabetes? Evaluation against National Screening Committee criteria.

Authors:  N J Wareham; S J Griffin
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-04-21

2.  Population-based stepwise screening for unrecognised Type 2 diabetes is ineffective in general practice despite reliable algorithms.

Authors:  J O Christensen; A Sandbaek; T Lauritzen; K Borch-Johnsen
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2004-09-08       Impact factor: 10.122

3.  Hyperglycaemia and mortality from all causes and from cardiovascular disease in five populations of Asian origin.

Authors:  T Nakagami
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2004-02-18       Impact factor: 10.122

4.  Different type 2 diabetes risk assessments predict dissimilar numbers at 'high risk': a retrospective analysis of diabetes risk-assessment tools.

Authors:  Benjamin J Gray; Richard M Bracken; Daniel Turner; Kerry Morgan; Michael Thomas; Sally P Williams; Meurig Williams; Sam Rice; Jeffrey W Stephens
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  Strategies to identify adults at high risk for type 2 diabetes: the Diabetes Prevention Program.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 19.112

6.  The lack of utility of circulating biomarkers of inflammation and endothelial dysfunction for type 2 diabetes risk prediction among postmenopausal women: the Women's Health Initiative Observational Study.

Authors:  Chun Chao; Yiqing Song; Nancy Cook; Chi-Hong Tseng; JoAnn E Manson; Charles Eaton; Karen L Margolis; Beatriz Rodriguez; Lawrence S Phillips; Lesley F Tinker; Simin Liu
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2010-09-27

7.  An algorithm to predict risk of type 2 diabetes in Turkish adults: contribution of C-reactive protein.

Authors:  A Onat; G Can; H Yüksel; E Ayhan; Y Dogan; G Hergenç
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 4.256

Review 8.  Novel biochemical risk factors for type 2 diabetes: pathogenic insights or prediction possibilities?

Authors:  N Sattar; S G Wannamethee; N G Forouhi
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2008-04-08       Impact factor: 10.122

Review 9.  Lay understanding of familial risk of common chronic diseases: a systematic review and synthesis of qualitative research.

Authors:  Fiona M Walter; Jon Emery; Dejana Braithwaite; Theresa M Marteau
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.166

10.  A prediction model for type 2 diabetes risk among Chinese people.

Authors:  K Chien; T Cai; H Hsu; T Su; W Chang; M Chen; Y Lee; F B Hu
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2008-12-05       Impact factor: 10.122

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.