Literature DB >> 10867679

The generalization of the odds ratio, risk ratio and risk difference to r x k tables.

M D Edwardes1, M Baltzan.   

Abstract

Familiar measures of association for 2 x 2 tables are the odds ratio, the risk ratio and the risk difference. Analagous measures of outcome-exposure association are desirable when there are several degrees of severity of both exposure and disease outcome. One such measure (alpha), which we label the general odds ratio (OR(G)), was proposed by Agresti. Convenient methods are given for calculation of both standard error and 95 per cent confidence intervals for OR(G). Other approaches to generalizing the odds ratio entail fitting statistical models which might not fit the data, and cannot handle some zero frequencies. We propose a generalization of the risk ratio (RR(G)) following the statistical approaches of Agresti, Goodman and Kruskal. A method of calculating the standard error and 95 per cent confidence interval for RR(G) is provided. A known statistic, Somers' d, fulfils the characteristics necessary for a generalized risk difference (RD(G)). These measures have straightforward interpretations, are easily computed, are at least as precise as other methods and do not require fitting statistical models to the data. We also examine the pooling of such measures as in, for example, meta-analysis. Copyright 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10867679     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0258(20000730)19:14<1901::aid-sim514>3.0.co;2-v

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  5 in total

1.  Age and "general health"-beside fracture classification-affect the therapeutic decision for geriatric pelvic ring fractures: a German pelvic injury register study.

Authors:  Andreas Höch; Philipp Pieroh; Florian Gras; Tim Hohmann; Sven Märdian; Francis Holmenschlager; Holger Keil; Hans-Georg Palm; Steven C Herath; Christoph Josten; Hagen Schmal; Fabian M Stuby
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  Duloxetine compared with fluoxetine and venlafaxine: use of meta-regression analysis for indirect comparisons.

Authors:  Laurent Eckert; Christophe Lançon
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2006-07-24       Impact factor: 3.630

3.  Sample size requirements for case-control study designs.

Authors:  M D Edwardes
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2001-11-19       Impact factor: 4.615

4.  The association in a two-way contingency table through log odds ratio analysis: the case of Sarno river pollution.

Authors:  Ida Camminatiello; Antonello D'Ambra; Pasquale Sarnacchiaro
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2014-07-28

5.  Effect size measures and their benchmark values for quantifying benefit or risk of medicinal products.

Authors:  Volker Rahlfs; Helmuth Zimmermann
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 2.207

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.