Literature DB >> 10867676

Modelling the cumulative risk for a false-positive under repeated screening events.

A E Gelfand1, F Wang.   

Abstract

Screening examinations are widely utilized in detecting the presence of medical disorders, for instance, screening mammograms and clinical breast examinations for detection of breast cancer. Such procedures are invaluable in enabling early treatment but produce the possibilities of false-positive and false-negative diagnoses. Focusing on false-positive results, with increasing number of screening events, it is clear that the risk of a false-positive increases. The objective of this paper is to quantify the cumulative risk associated with repeated screening. We provide a very general framework within which to investigate this risk, both at the population and the individual level. The latter allows incorporation of evolving patient medical history to permit individualized assessment of risk. We model cumulative risk in terms of the number of screening events until first false-positive. We develop models which are essentially familiar actuarial models for life table data adding a Cox regression to enable individual level modelling. Because it offers several advantages, we employ a Bayesian inference framework and apply our modelling to the analysis of 9773 screening mammograms collected from 2227 women at an HMO serving nearly 300000 adults in and around Boston, MA. Copyright 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10867676     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0258(20000730)19:14<1865::aid-sim512>3.0.co;2-m

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  13 in total

1.  Cumulative probability of false-positive recall or biopsy recommendation after 10 years of screening mammography: a cohort study.

Authors:  Rebecca A Hubbard; Karla Kerlikowske; Chris I Flowers; Bonnie C Yankaskas; Weiwei Zhu; Diana L Miglioretti
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Modelling the cumulative risk of a false-positive screening test.

Authors:  Rebecca A Hubbard; Diana L Miglioretti; Robert A Smith
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 3.021

3.  Statistical Methods for Estimating the Cumulative Risk of Screening Mammography Outcomes.

Authors:  Rebecca A Hubbard; Theodora M Ripping; Jessica Chubak; Mireille J M Broeders; Diana L Miglioretti
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2015-12-31       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  Interval-censored data with misclassification: a Bayesian approach.

Authors:  Magda Carvalho Pires; Enrico Antônio Colosimo; Guilherme Augusto Veloso; Raquel de Souza Borges Ferreira
Journal:  J Appl Stat       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 1.416

5.  A semiparametric censoring bias model for estimating the cumulative risk of a false-positive screening test under dependent censoring.

Authors:  Rebecca A Hubbard; Diana L Miglioretti
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Breast cancer risk prediction and mammography biopsy decisions: a model-based study.

Authors:  Katrina Armstrong; Elizabeth A Handorf; Jinbo Chen; Mirar N Bristol Demeter
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 5.043

7.  Cumulative false positive recall rate and association with participant related factors in a population based breast cancer screening programme.

Authors:  Xavier Castells; Eduard Molins; Francesc Macià
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.710

8.  Incorporating validation subsets into discrete proportional hazards models for mismeasured outcomes.

Authors:  Amalia S Magaret
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-11-20       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 9.  Statistical modeling of Huntington disease onset.

Authors:  Tanya P Garcia; Karen Marder; Yuanjia Wang
Journal:  Handb Clin Neurol       Date:  2017

10.  Nonhomogeneous Markov chain for estimating the cumulative risk of multiple false positive screening tests.

Authors:  Marzieh K Golmakani; Rebecca A Hubbard; Diana L Miglioretti
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 1.701

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.