Literature DB >> 10867453

Accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography in preoperative staging of esophageal carcinoma.

J Heidemann1, M K Schilling, A Schmassmann, C A Maurer, M W Büchler.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: With the advent of stage-adapted multimodal regimens for many gastrointestinal malignancies, accurate staging has become of utmost importance. In esophageal cancer, endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) emerged as standard to determine T and N stage.
OBJECTIVE: Since growth patterns of squamous carcinoma (SC) differs from adenocarcinoma (AC) and lymph nodes are located at various distances from the esophagus in a horizontal plane, we studied the accuracy of esophageal EUS as a function of tumor type and localization of the tumor within the esophagus.
RESULTS: Overall staging accuracy was 79% for T and for N staging. Staging was more accurate for T3/4, when compared to T1/2 tumors, and for SC when compared to AC. Histological T1/2 stages were overstaged by EUS in 8/17 patients, mostly in patients with AC (6/10). The sensitivity of retrosternal pain and of dysphagia for extramural disease was 57 and 92% respectively, the specificity of pain for extramural disease was 73%, and of dysphagia 36%. Preoperative weight loss in this series correlated linearly with tumor stages.
CONCLUSIONS: The accurate preoperative staging of T2 esophageal endodermal malignancies is crucial for treatment stratification but difficult to achieve by visual analysis of endosonography alone. Postacquisition processing of echoendosonographic images might further increase the accuracy of echoendosonography and aid in the critical differentiation of T2 versus T3 esophageal malignancies. Preoperative weight loss and retrosternal pain are good clinical indicators of extramural disease. Copyright 2000 S. Karger AG, Basel

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10867453     DOI: 10.1159/000018838

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Surg        ISSN: 0253-4886            Impact factor:   2.588


  11 in total

Review 1.  Staging accuracy of esophageal cancer by endoscopic ultrasound: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  Srinivas-R Puli; Jyotsna-Bk Reddy; Matthew-L Bechtold; Daphne Antillon; Jamal-A Ibdah; Mainor-R Antillon
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-03-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Endoscopic ultrasound: it's accuracy in evaluating mediastinal lymphadenopathy? A meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  Srinivas-R Puli; Jyotsna Batapati Krishna Reddy; Matthew-L Bechtold; Jamal-A Ibdah; Daphne Antillon; Shailender Singh; Mojtaba Olyaee; Mainor-R Antillon
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-05-21       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Celiac node failure patterns after definitive chemoradiation for esophageal cancer in the modern era.

Authors:  Arya Amini; Lianchun Xiao; Pamela K Allen; Akihiro Suzuki; Yuki Hayashi; Zhongxing Liao; Wayne Hofstetter; Christopher Crane; Ritsuko Komaki; Manoop S Bhutani; Jeffrey H Lee; Jaffer A Ajani; James Welsh
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2012-03-19       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 4.  Endoscopic mucosal resection in the management of esophageal neoplasia: current status and future directions.

Authors:  Vikneswaran Namasivayam; Kenneth K Wang; Ganapathy A Prasad
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 11.382

5.  You get what you expect? A critical appraisal of imaging methodology in endosonographic cancer staging.

Authors:  A Meining; H J Dittler; A Wolf; R Lorenz; V Schusdziarra; J-R Siewert; M Classen; H Höfler; T Rösch
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  Preoperative TN staging of esophageal cancer: comparison of miniprobe ultrasonography, spiral CT and MRI.

Authors:  Ling-Fei Wu; Bing-Zhou Wang; Jia-Lin Feng; Wei-Rong Cheng; Guo-Re Liu; Xiao-Hua Xu; Zhi-Chao Zheng
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Endoscopic ultrasound with conventional probe and miniprobe in preoperative staging of esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Rudolf Mennigen; Dirk Tuebergen; Gabriele Koehler; Cristina Sauerland; Norbert Senninger; Matthias Bruewer
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-09-06       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Impact of endoscopic ultrasonography and physician specialty on the management of patients with esophagus cancer.

Authors:  A Gines; S D Cassivi; J A Martenson; C Schleck; C Deschamps; F A Sinicrope; S R Alberts; J A Murray; Alan R Zinsmeister; Enrique Vazquez-Sequeiros; F C Nichols; R C Miller; J F Quevedo; M S Allen; J A Alexander; T Zais; M G Haddock; Y Romero
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.429

9.  Clinical implication of the innovations of the 8th edition of the TNM classification for esophageal and esophago-gastric cancer.

Authors:  Xavier Benoit D'Journo
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.895

10.  Staging of T1 esophageal adenocarcinoma with volumetric laser endomicroscopy: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Allon Kahn; Amrit K Kamboj; Prasuna Muppa; Tarek Sawas; Lori S Lutzke; Matthew R Buras; Michael A Golafshar; David A Katzka; Prasad G Iyer; Thomas C Smyrk; Kenneth K Wang; Cadman L Leggett
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2019-03-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.