Literature DB >> 10867451

What's new with tumor markers for colorectal cancer?

R M Pokorny1, L Hunt, S Galandiuk.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Many tumor markers have been utilized in the follow-up care of colorectal cancer patients. No marker, however, has proven reliably accurate in detecting recurrent disease.
METHODS: The strengths and weaknesses of currently available tumor markers are reviewed, with attention to related cost and efficacy.
RESULTS: Tumor antigens, enzymes, and genetic markers have been used as tumor markers. CEA and CA 19.9 are the most widely utilized; however, genetic markers are the most promising for the future.
CONCLUSIONS: Currently available markers have significant limitations. Development of genetic markers may greatly enhance our ability to predict prognosis and the need for adjuvant therapy. Marker-guided therapy may play an increasing role in this disease. Copyright 2000 S. Karger AG, Basel

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10867451     DOI: 10.1159/000018853

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Surg        ISSN: 0253-4886            Impact factor:   2.588


  8 in total

1.  The serum level of carcinoembryonic antigen in drainage venous blood is not a sensitive predictor of metachronous hepatic metastasis for patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Masashi Haraguchi; Fumihiko Fujita; Yasuhiro Torashima; Takamitsu Inokuma; Yoshitsugu Tajima; Takashi Kanematsu
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2010-07-30       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 2.  Genetic and epigenetic biomarkers in cancer : improving diagnosis, risk assessment, and disease stratification.

Authors:  Mukesh Verma; Daniela Seminara; Fernando J Arena; Christy John; Kumiko Iwamoto; Virginia Hartmuller
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.074

3.  Quantitative expression analysis and prognostic significance of L-DOPA decarboxylase in colorectal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  C K Kontos; I N Papadopoulos; E G Fragoulis; A Scorilas
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 7.640

4.  High miR-96 levels in colorectal adenocarcinoma predict poor prognosis, particularly in patients without distant metastasis at the time of initial diagnosis.

Authors:  Stamatia-Maria Rapti; Christos K Kontos; Iordanis N Papadopoulos; Andreas Scorilas
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2016-04-04

5.  Clinical relevance of serum vascular endothelial growth factor and interleukin-6 in patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Ayman Eldesoky; Ashraf Shouma; Yousef Mosaad; Amira Elhawary
Journal:  Saudi J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.485

6.  Association of vascular endothelial growth factor gene polymorphisms with susceptibility and clinicopathologic characteristics of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Yee Soo Chae; Jong Gwang Kim; Sang Kyun Sohn; Yoon Young Cho; Byung Min Ahn; Joon Ho Moon; Seoung Woo Jeon; Jae Yong Park; In Taek Lee; Gyu Seog Choi; Soo-Han Jun
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.153

7.  Tumor pyruvate kinase M2: A promising molecular target of gastrointestinal cancer.

Authors:  Chen Guo; Guan Li; Jianing Hou; Xingming Deng; Sheng Ao; Zhuofei Li; Guoqing Lyu
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 5.087

8.  TM9SF4 expression in tumor tissues: a novel diagnostic biomarker for gastrointestinal tumors.

Authors:  Paolo Guazzi; Davide Zocco; Sergejs Isajevs; Natasa Zarovni; Laura Bianciardi; Mart Toots; Armands Sivins; Marcis Leja; Antonio Chiesi; Francesco Lozupone
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 1.241

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.