Literature DB >> 10867086

Program participation, exercise adherence, cardiovascular outcomes, and program cost of traditional versus modified cardiac rehabilitation.

J J Carlson1, J A Johnson, B A Franklin, R L VanderLaan.   

Abstract

Common concerns with the traditional protocol (TP) for cardiac rehabilitation include suboptimal program participation, poor facilitation of independent exercise, the use of costly continuous electrocardiographic (ECG) monitoring, and lack of insurance reimbursement. To address these concerns, a reduced cost-modified protocol (MP) was developed to promote independent exercise. Eighty low- to moderate-risk cardiac patients were randomized to a TP (n = 42) or a MP (n = 38) and were compared over 6 months on program participation, exercise adherence, cardiovascular outcomes, and program costs. During month 1, patients followed identical regimens, including 3 ECG-monitored exercise sessions/week, with encouragement to achieve >/=5 thirty-minute sessions/week. In week 5, the TP continued with a facility-based regimen including 3 exercise sessions/week for 6 months and used ECG monitoring the initial 3 months. The MP discontinued ECG monitoring in week 5 and were gradually weaned to an off-site exercise regimen that was complemented with educational support meetings and telephone follow-up. Compared with TP patients, MP patients had higher rates of off-site exercise over 6 months (p = 0.05), and total exercise (on site + off site) during the final 3 months (p = 0.03). Also, MP patients were less likely to drop out (p = 0.05). Both protocols promoted comparable improvements in maximal oxygen uptake (p <0.05), blood lipids (p <0.001), and hemodynamic measurements (p <0.002). The MP cost $738 less/patient than the TP and required 30% less staff (full-time equivalents). These results suggest that a reduced cost MP was as effective as an established TP in improving physiologic outcomes while demonstrating higher rates of exercise adherence and program participation. Thus, the MP or a similar protocol has applicability to hospitals with large capitated or managed care populations to provide cost-effective cardiovascular risk reduction to patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10867086     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(00)00822-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  44 in total

1.  Feasibility of a Smartphone-enabled Cardiac Rehabilitation Program in Male Veterans With Previous Clinical Evidence of Coronary Heart Disease.

Authors:  Arash Harzand; Bradley Witbrodt; Michelle L Davis-Watts; Alaaeddin Alrohaibani; David Goese; Nanette K Wenger; Amit J Shah; Abarmard Maziar Zafari
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2018-08-04       Impact factor: 2.778

2.  Feasibility, Acceptability and Effects of a Home-Based Exercise Program Using a Gerontechnology on Physical Capacities after a Minor Injury in Community-Living Older Adults: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  M Lauzé; D D Martel; A Agnoux; M-J Sirois; M Émond; R Daoust; M Aubertin-Leheudre
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 4.075

Review 3.  Global availability of cardiac rehabilitation.

Authors:  Karam Turk-Adawi; Nizal Sarrafzadegan; Sherry L Grace
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 32.419

4.  Phase I of cardiac rehabilitation: A new challenge for evidence based physiotherapy.

Authors:  Rafael Michel de Macedo; José Rocha Faria-Neto; Costantino Ortiz Costantini; Dayane Casali; Andrea Pires Muller; Costantino Roberto Costantini; Katherine Athayde Teixeira de Carvalho; Luiz César Guarita-Souza
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2011-07-26

5.  Internet-based training of coronary artery patients: the Heart Cycle Trial.

Authors:  Erik Skobel; Christian Knackstedt; Alvaro Martinez-Romero; Dario Salvi; Cecilia Vera-Munoz; Andreas Napp; Jean Luprano; Ramon Bover; Sigrid Glöggler; Birna Bjarnason-Wehrens; Nikolaus Marx; Alan Rigby; John Cleland
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 6.  Clinical research in cardiac rehabilitation and secondary prevention: looking back and moving forward.

Authors:  Patrick D Savage; Bonnie K Sanderson; Todd M Brown; Kathy Berra; Philip A Ades
Journal:  J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev       Date:  2011 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.081

7.  Effects of partners together in health intervention on physical activity and healthy eating behaviors: a pilot study.

Authors:  Bernice C Yates; Joseph Norman; Jane Meza; Kaye Stanek Krogstrand; Susana Harrington; Scott Shurmur; Matthew Johnson; Karen Schumacher
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Nurs       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.083

8.  Influence of Depression on Utilization of Cardiac Rehabilitation Postmyocardial Infarction: A STUDY OF 158 991 MEDICARE BENEFICIARIES.

Authors:  Melissa D Zullo; Emily C Gathright; Mary A Dolansky; Richard A Josephson; Vinay K Cheruvu; Joel W Hughes
Journal:  J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.081

9.  A multisite examination of sex differences in cardiac rehabilitation barriers by participation status.

Authors:  Sherry L Grace; Shannon Gravely-Witte; Sheena Kayaniyil; Janette Brual; Neville Suskin; Donna E Stewart
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.681

Review 10.  Home based versus centre based cardiac rehabilitation: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hasnain M Dalal; Anna Zawada; Kate Jolly; Tiffany Moxham; Rod S Taylor
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-01-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.