Literature DB >> 10865776

Body composition measurements during infancy.

W W Koo1.   

Abstract

Infancy is the period of most rapid postnatal growth and is accompanied by major changes in body composition (BC). There are many challenges to successfully measuring BC of infants in vivo, which include the inherent limitations in the underlying assumptions for each technique. The small body mass and rapid nonuniform changes in body parts, that is, the components of BC during infancy, can strain the technical limits of all methods. Many techniques for in vivo BC measurement used in older people have been applied to infants. However, the vast majority of them either are difficult to adapt for widespread use in infants, or the roles and limitations for using them during infancy are ill-defined because of limited or no critical validation and cross-calibration studies. Based on validation data from animals, well-defined methodological issues in data acquisition and analyses, availability of normative data, and pertinent accuracy and precision of the technique to allow us to determinate clinically relevant changes in BC within a reasonable time interval, three techniques appear to be most suitable for in vivo BC measurement in infants. Anthropometric measurements can be used in field studies or for group comparisons, and total body electrical conductivity (TOBEC) and selected dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measurements can be used to compare BC in individual infants. DXA has the advantages of being able to measure bone mass and the potential to be adaptable to the widely available existing instruments. However, regardless of the techniques used in measuring BC in infants, meticulous attention to details in data acquisition and data analysis, and a knowledge of the limitations of the particular technique are the prerequisites for generating valid data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10865776     DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2000.tb06487.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci        ISSN: 0077-8923            Impact factor:   5.691


  7 in total

1.  No association of obesity gene FTO with body composition at the age of 6 months. The Generation R Study.

Authors:  D O Mook-Kanamori; L Ay; A Hofman; C M van Duijn; H A Moll; H Raat; A C S Hokken-Koelega; V W V Jaddoe
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2010-05-28       Impact factor: 4.256

Review 2.  Comparing apples with apples: it is time for standardized reporting of neonatal nutrition and growth studies.

Authors:  Barbara E Cormack; Nicholas D Embleton; Johannes B van Goudoever; William W Hay; Frank H Bloomfield
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 3.756

3.  Validation of surrogate limb analysis for body composition in children by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).

Authors:  D J Rodrigopulle; S A Atkinson
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 4.016

4.  Infant overweight is associated with delayed motor development.

Authors:  Meghan Slining; Linda S Adair; Barbara Davis Goldman; Judith B Borja; Margaret Bentley
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 4.406

Review 5.  Body composition assessment in the infant.

Authors:  Ellen W Demerath; David A Fields
Journal:  Am J Hum Biol       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 1.937

6.  Body composition assessment in infancy and early childhood: comparison of anthropometry with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in low-income group children from India.

Authors:  B Kulkarni; R S Mamidi; N Balakrishna; K V Radhakrishna
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 4.016

7.  Antibiotic exposure in infancy and development of BMI and body composition in childhood.

Authors:  Tobias Steen Sejersen; Rebecca Kofod Vinding; Jakob Stokholm; Bo Chawes; Klaus Bønnelykke; Martin Krakauer; Hans Bisgaard
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2019-11-27
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.