Literature DB >> 10865219

Cyclical etidronate versus sodium fluoride in established postmenopausal osteoporosis: a randomized 3 year trial.

N Guañabens1, J Farrerons, L Perez-Edo, A Monegal, A Renau, J Carbonell, M Roca, M Torra, M Pavesi.   

Abstract

To compare the effects of sodium fluoride and etidronate in severe postmenopausal osteoporosis, we conducted a 3 year, prospective, trial in 118 postmenopausal osteoporotic women with at least one vertebral fracture, who were randomly assigned to receive sodium fluoride (25 mg twice daily, as enteric-coated tablets) plus calcium (1000 mg/day) or intermittent etidronate (400 mg/day for 14 days) followed by calcium (1000 mg/day for 76 days). Lateral spine X-ray films and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measurements of the lumbar spine and proximal femur were performed at enrollment and yearly. Nonvertebral fractures were recorded every 6 months. Thirty-one women in the fluoride group and 47 in the etidronate group completed the trial. At 36 months, the mean change from baseline of the lumbar bone density in the fluoride group was 8.5 +/- 2.04% (p = 0.001) and in the etidronate group was of 3.6 +/- 0. 84% (p < 0.001). The changes in the fluoride group were significantly higher than in the etidronate group (p = 0.01). Both groups showed nonsignificant changes in femoral neck bone density. There was no significant difference between groups in the cumulative proportion of women with new vertebral fractures, with an incidence in the fluoride group of 16% vs. 17% in the etidronate group. However, the number of new vertebral fractures was significantly lower in the fluoride group (6 fractures) than in the etidronate group (19 fractures) (p = 0.05). The number of patients with nonvertebral fractures was similar in both groups. A high incidence of side effects, mainly gastrointestinal symptoms and lower extremity pain syndrome, was observed in the fluoride group. Etidronate was well tolerated. We conclude that, in women with severe osteoporosis, although sodium fluoride is more favorable than cyclical etidronate for increasing lumbar bone mass, no differences were observed in the incidence of fractures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10865219     DOI: 10.1016/s8756-3282(00)00303-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  6 in total

1.  Substituted hydroxyapatites for bone repair.

Authors:  Jennifer H Shepherd; David V Shepherd; Serena M Best
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2012-03-03       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 2.  2002 clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in Canada.

Authors:  Jacques P Brown; Robert G Josse
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-11-12       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 3.  Metabolic bone disease in patients with liver disease.

Authors:  Elizabeth Carey; Vijayan Balan
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2003-02

Review 4.  Effects of treatment with fluoride on bone mineral density and fracture risk--a meta-analysis.

Authors:  P Vestergaard; N R Jorgensen; P Schwarz; L Mosekilde
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-08-15       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 5.  Etidronate for the primary and secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  G A Wells; A Cranney; J Peterson; M Boucher; B Shea; V Robinson; D Coyle; P Tugwell
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-01-23

6.  Synthesis of fluoride-releasing carbonate apatites for bone substitutes.

Authors:  Yu Sogo; Atsuo Ito; Daiki Yokoyama; Atsushi Yamazaki; Racquel Z LeGeros
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2007-01-23       Impact factor: 4.727

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.