Literature DB >> 10863125

Abortion surveillance at CDC: creating public health light out of political heat.

W Cates1, D A Grimes, K F Schulz.   

Abstract

In the late 1960s, states began to liberalize their abortion laws, and a new era in women's health began. Under the leadership of Jack Smith, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) established a voluntary abortion surveillance system that provided the first nationwide information on the numbers and characteristics of women having abortions. Studies of abortion morbidity done by the CDC revealed that suction curettage was safer than sharp curettage, local anesthesia was safer than general anesthesia, free-standing clinics were safer than hospitals, and dilation and evacuation (D&E) was safer than the alternative of labor induction for early second-trimester abortions. This evidence, which contradicted traditional medical tenets, rapidly changed the practice of abortion in the United States. CDC also established a surveillance system for abortion deaths. This demonstrated a rapid improvement in the safety of abortion in the early 1970s. Lessons learned from mortality investigations helped to change practice as well.Today, more is known about the epidemiology of abortion than any other operation in the history of medicine. In the midst of strident debate over the abortion issue, CDC abortion surveillance data have helped to guide judicial rulings, legislative actions, and Surgeon General's reports, which have supported safer choices for women of reproductive age. When medical historians of the future look back on this century, the increasing availability of safe, legal abortion will stand out as a public health triumph.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10863125     DOI: 10.1016/s0749-3797(00)00168-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Prev Med        ISSN: 0749-3797            Impact factor:   5.043


  4 in total

1.  Does information about abortion safety affect Texas voters' opinions about restrictive laws? A randomized study.

Authors:  Kari White; Daniel Grossman; Amanda Jean Stevenson; Kristine Hopkins; Joseph E Potter
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 3.375

Review 2.  Public Health Impact of Legal Termination of Pregnancy in the US: 40 Years Later.

Authors:  John M Thorp
Journal:  Scientifica (Cairo)       Date:  2012-12-13

3.  Approaches, barriers, and facilitators to abortion-related work in U.S. health departments: perspectives of maternal and child heath and family planning professionals.

Authors:  Nancy F Berglas; Erin Wingo; Katie Woodruff; Sarah C M Roberts
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2020-03-06       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  Safety and efficacy of manual vacuum suction compared with conventional dilatation and sharp curettage and electric vacuum aspiration in surgical treatment of miscarriage: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Toshiyuki Kakinuma; Kaoru Kakinuma; Yuuka Sakamoto; Yoshimasa Kawarai; Koyomi Saito; Motomasa Ihara; Yoshio Matsuda; Ikuo Sato; Michitaka Ohwada; Kaoru Yanagida; Hirokazu Tanaka
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 3.007

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.