Literature DB >> 10863049

A validated, practical classification procedure for many persistent low back pain patients.

Mohammed BenDebba1, Warren S Torgerson, Donlin M Long.   

Abstract

We have developed a simple procedure for assigning persistent low back pain patients to one of four mutually exclusive, hierarchically organized classes. The procedure relies on the spatial distribution of a patient's pain and the results of straight leg raise tests to make the assignment. We have applied the procedure to a large group of patients who sought treatment for persistent LBP at several university affiliated tertiary care clinics, and found that the resulting four classes of patients were significantly different from one another in their presentation, and in the way they were evaluated and treated by physicians. We concluded that the procedure may have practical research and clinical applications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10863049     DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3959(00)00278-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  10 in total

1.  Inter-examiner reliability in the assessment of low back pain (LBP) using the Kirkaldy-Willis classification (KWC).

Authors:  Bo C Bertilson; Johan Bring; Anneli Sjöblom; Karin Sundell; Lars-Erik Strender
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-01-25       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Subclassification of low back pain: a cross-country comparison.

Authors:  Evdokia V Billis; Christopher J McCarthy; Jacqueline A Oldham
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-03-17       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Management of a patient with lumbar segmental instability using a clinical predictor rule.

Authors:  Anna Ribaudo
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2013-08-14

4.  The Role of Decreased Hip IR as a Cause of Low Back Pain in a Golfer: a Case Report.

Authors:  Gregory Reinhardt
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2013-08-24

Review 5.  Physiotherapy movement based classification approaches to low back pain: comparison of subgroups through review and developer/expert survey.

Authors:  Nicholas V Karayannis; Gwendolen A Jull; Paul W Hodges
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2012-02-20       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  The McKenzie Method for the management of acute non-specific low back pain: design of a randomised controlled trial [ACTRN012605000032651].

Authors:  Luciana A C Machado; Chris G Maher; Rob D Herbert; Helen Clare; James McAuley
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2005-10-13       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Prognostic implications of the Quebec Task Force classification of back-related leg pain: an analysis of longitudinal routine clinical data.

Authors:  Alice Kongsted; Peter Kent; Tue Secher Jensen; Hanne Albert; Claus Manniche
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Patients with low back pain differ from those who also have leg pain or signs of nerve root involvement - a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Alice Kongsted; Peter Kent; Hanne Albert; Tue Secher Jensen; Claus Manniche
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 9.  Classification of patients with low back-related leg pain: a systematic review.

Authors:  Siobhán Stynes; Kika Konstantinou; Kate M Dunn
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Characteristics of patients with low back and leg pain seeking treatment in primary care: baseline results from the ATLAS cohort study.

Authors:  Kika Konstantinou; Kate M Dunn; Reuben Ogollah; Steven Vogel; Elaine M Hay
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 2.362

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.