Literature DB >> 10863043

Phantom pain and phantom sensations in upper limb amputees: an epidemiological study.

Carolien M Kooijman1, Pieter U Dijkstra, Jan H B Geertzen, Albert Elzinga, Cees P van der Schans.   

Abstract

Phantom pain in subjects with an amputated limb is a well-known problem. However, estimates of the prevalence of phantom pain differ considerably in the literature. Various factors associated with phantom pain have been described including pain before the amputation, gender, dominance, and time elapsed since the amputation. The purposes of this study were to determine prevalence and factors associated with phantom pain and phantom sensations in upper limb amputees in The Netherlands. Additionally, the relationship between phantom pain, phantom sensations and prosthesis use in upper limb amputees was investigated. One hundred twenty-four upper limb amputees participated in this study. Subjects were asked to fill out a self-developed questionnaire scoring the following items: date, side, level, and reason of amputation, duration of experienced pain before amputation, frequencies with which phantom sensations, phantom pain, and stump pain are experienced, amount of trouble and suffering experienced, respectively, related to these sensations, type of phantom sensations, medical treatment received for phantom pain and/or stump pain, and the effects of the treatment, self medication, and prosthesis use. The response rate was 80%. The prevalence of phantom pain was 51%, of phantom sensations 76% and of stump pain 49%; 48% of the subjects experienced phantom pain a few times per day or more; 64% experienced moderate to very much suffering from the phantom pain. A significant association was found between phantom pain and phantom sensations (relative risk 11.3) and between phantom pain and stump pain (relative risk 1.9). No other factors associated with phantom pain or phantom sensations could be determined. Only four patients received medical treatment for their phantom pain. Phantom pain is a common problem in upper limb amputees that causes considerable suffering for the subjects involved. Only a minority of subjects are treated for phantom pain. Further research is needed to determine factors associated with phantom pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10863043     DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3959(00)00264-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  90 in total

1.  Treatment of chronic phantom limb pain using a trauma-focused psychological approach.

Authors:  Carlijn de Roos; A C Veenstra; A de Jongh; M den Hollander-Gijsman; N J A van der Wee; F G Zitman; Y R van Rood
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2010 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.037

Review 2.  Neural interfaces for somatosensory feedback: bringing life to a prosthesis.

Authors:  Dustin J Tyler
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 5.710

3.  Where is hidden the ghost in phantom sensations?

Authors:  Michelangelo Buonocore
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 1.337

Review 4.  Incarnation and animation: physical versus representational deficits of body integrity.

Authors:  Leonie Maria Hilti; Peter Brugger
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-10-25       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Pain Phenotypes and Associated Clinical Risk Factors Following Traumatic Amputation: Results from Veterans Integrated Pain Evaluation Research (VIPER).

Authors:  Thomas Buchheit; Thomas Van de Ven; Hung-Lun John Hsia; Mary McDuffie; David B MacLeod; William White; Alexander Chamessian; Francis J Keefe; Chester Trip Buckenmaier; Andrew D Shaw
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 3.750

6.  The map is not the territory: motor system reorganization in upper limb amputees.

Authors:  Martin Gagné; Sébastien Hétu; Karen T Reilly; Catherine Mercier
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 7.  Drug infusions for the diagnosis and treatment of chronic pain.

Authors:  David A O'Gorman; Srinivasa N Raja
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2002-12

8.  Evoked Haptic Sensation in the Hand With Concurrent Non-Invasive Nerve Stimulation.

Authors:  Luis Vargas; Graham Whitehouse; He Huang; Yong Zhu; Xiaogang Hu
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 4.538

9.  [Phantom pain after eye enucleation].

Authors:  H Gerding; O Vo; I W Husstedt; S Evers; P Sörös
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 1.059

10.  Phantom limb pain: low frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in unaffected hemisphere.

Authors:  Andrea Di Rollo; Stefano Pallanti
Journal:  Case Rep Med       Date:  2011-05-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.