Literature DB >> 10862852

Extra-amniotic saline, laminaria, or prostaglandin E(2) gel for labor induction with unfavorable cervix: a randomized controlled trial.

D A Guinn1, A R Goepfert, M Christine, J Owen, J C Hauth.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine which of three methods of cervical ripening resulted in the lowest cesarean rate in women with unfavorable cervices and indications for labor induction.
METHODS: Consenting women with singleton gestations, vertex presentations, and unfavorable cervices (dilatation under 2 cm and effacement under 75%) were randomly assigned to laminaria and standard intravenous oxytocin, serial doses of intracervical prostaglandin (PG) E(2) gel (Prepidil, Pharmacia & Upjohn, Inc., Kalamazoo, MI) 0.5 microg every 6 hours for two doses followed by oxytocin if indicated, or extra-amniotic saline infusion and oxytocin.
RESULTS: An interim analysis after recruitment of 321 subjects, 67% of the planned sample, found similar cesarean rates for the three groups (laminaria 36%; PGE(2) gel 33%; saline infusion 29%; P =.59); however, the mean randomization-to-delivery interval was significantly longer in the PGE(2) group. Stochastic curtailment, as part of the interim analysis, indicated a low likelihood of achieving a statistically significant difference in cesarean rates between PGE(2) gel and the other two groups. Therefore, we completed the study with saline infusion and laminaria. The saline infusion and laminaria groups had similar preinduction characteristics. The cesarean rates were similar (saline infusion 25.4% versus laminaria 30.3%; P =.32), but the mean interval from randomization to delivery was shorter in the saline infusion group (18.0 versus 21.5 hours, P =.002). There were no significant differences in selected maternal and neonatal morbidities.
CONCLUSION: Cervical ripening with extra-amniotic saline infusion, PGE(2), or laminaria resulted in comparable cesarean rates in women with an unfavorable cervix and indications for labor induction. Extra-amniotic saline infusion had the shortest randomization-to-delivery interval without increasing maternal or neonatal morbidity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10862852     DOI: 10.1016/s0029-7844(00)00856-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  3 in total

Review 1.  Mechanical methods for induction of labour.

Authors:  Marieke Dt de Vaan; Mieke Lg Ten Eikelder; Marta Jozwiak; Kirsten R Palmer; Miranda Davies-Tuck; Kitty Wm Bloemenkamp; Ben Willem J Mol; Michel Boulvain
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-10-18

2.  Balloon dilators for labor induction: a historical review.

Authors:  James Andrew Smith
Journal:  J Med Ethics Hist Med       Date:  2013-11-03

3.  A randomized controlled trial of foley catheter, extra-amniotic saline infusion and prostaglandin e2 suppository for labor induction.

Authors:  Mandana Mansour Ghanaie; Mina Jafarabadi; Forozan Milani; Seyed Alaedin Asgary; Morteza Fallah Karkan
Journal:  J Family Reprod Health       Date:  2013-06
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.