Literature DB >> 10862674

Mechanochemical manipulation of hepatocyte aggregation can selectively induce or repress liver-specific function.

E J Semler1, C S Ranucci, P V Moghe.   

Abstract

Controlled activation of hepatocyte aggregation is critical to three-dimensional (3D) multicellular morphogenesis during native regeneration of liver as well as tissue reconstruction therapies. In this work, we quantify the stimulatory effects of two model hepatotrophic activators, epidermal growth factor (EGF) and hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), on the aggregation kinetics and liver-specific function of hepatocytes cultured on organotypic substrates with differing mechanical resistivity. Substrate-specific morphogenesis of cultured hepatocytes is induced on a tissue basement membrane extract, Matrigel, formulated at two distinct levels of mechanical compliance (storage modulus G', at oscillatory shear rate 1 rad/s, was 34 Pa for basal Matrigel and 118 Pa for crosslinked Matrigel). Overall, we report that growth factor stimulation selectively promotes the kinetics of aggregation in the form of two-dimensional corded aggregates on basal Matrigel and three-dimensional spheroidal aggregates on crosslinked Matrigel. Our analysis also indicates that costimulation with EGF and HGF (20 ng/mL each) cooperatively maximizes the kinetics of aggregation in a substrate-specific manner. In addition, we show that the role of growth factor stimulation on hepatocyte function is sensitively governed by the mechanical compliance of the substrate. In particular, on matrices with high compliance, costimulatory aggregation is shown to elicit a marked increase in albumin secretion rate, whereas on matrices with low compliance aggregation results in effective functional repression to basal, unstimulated levels. Thus, our studies highlight a novel interplay of physicochemical parameters of the culture microenvironment, leading to selective enhancement or repression of differentiated functions of hepatocytes, in concert with the activation of cellular morphogenesis. Copyright 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10862674     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0290(20000820)69:4<359::aid-bit2>3.0.co;2-q

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng        ISSN: 0006-3592            Impact factor:   4.530


  29 in total

1.  Physiological ranges of matrix rigidity modulate primary mouse hepatocyte function in part through hepatocyte nuclear factor 4 alpha.

Authors:  Seema S Desai; Jason C Tung; Vivian X Zhou; James P Grenert; Yann Malato; Milad Rezvani; Regina Español-Suñer; Holger Willenbring; Valerie M Weaver; Tammy T Chang
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 17.425

Review 2.  In vitro platforms for evaluating liver toxicity.

Authors:  Shyam Sundhar Bale; Lawrence Vernetti; Nina Senutovitch; Rohit Jindal; Manjunath Hegde; Albert Gough; William J McCarty; Ahmet Bakan; Abhinav Bhushan; Tong Ying Shun; Inna Golberg; Richard DeBiasio; Berk Osman Usta; D Lansing Taylor; Martin L Yarmush
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2014-04-24

Review 3.  Indentation versus tensile measurements of Young's modulus for soft biological tissues.

Authors:  Clayton T McKee; Julie A Last; Paul Russell; Christopher J Murphy
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 6.389

4.  In vivo effects of isolated implantation of salmon-derived crosslinked atelocollagen sponge into an osteochondral defect.

Authors:  Yasuyuki Kawaguchi; Eiji Kondo; Nobuto Kitamura; Kazunobu Arakaki; Yasuhito Tanaka; Masanobu Munekata; Nobuhiro Nagai; Kazunori Yasuda
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2011-01-23       Impact factor: 3.896

5.  Bioinspired liver scaffold design criteria.

Authors:  Giorgio Mattei; Chiara Magliaro; Andrea Pirone; Arti Ahluwalia
Journal:  Organogenesis       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 2.500

Review 6.  Liver bioengineering: from the stage of liver decellularized matrix to the multiple cellular actors and bioreactor special effects.

Authors:  Mireia Caralt; Enrique Velasco; Angel Lanas; Pedro M Baptista
Journal:  Organogenesis       Date:  2014-08-11       Impact factor: 2.500

Review 7.  Screening out irrelevant cell-based models of disease.

Authors:  Peter Horvath; Nathalie Aulner; Marc Bickle; Anthony M Davies; Elaine Del Nery; Daniel Ebner; Maria C Montoya; Päivi Östling; Vilja Pietiäinen; Leo S Price; Spencer L Shorte; Gerardo Turcatti; Carina von Schantz; Neil O Carragher
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2016-09-12       Impact factor: 84.694

8.  Synthetic alternatives to Matrigel.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Aisenbrey; William L Murphy
Journal:  Nat Rev Mater       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 66.308

9.  Modulation of hepatocyte phenotype in vitro via chemomechanical tuning of polyelectrolyte multilayers.

Authors:  Alice A Chen; Salman R Khetani; Sunyoung Lee; Sangeeta N Bhatia; Krystyn J Van Vliet
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2008-11-28       Impact factor: 12.479

10.  In situ mechanical interferometry of matrigel films.

Authors:  Jason Reed; Wanda J Walczak; Odessa N Petzold; James K Gimzewski
Journal:  Langmuir       Date:  2009-01-06       Impact factor: 3.882

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.