Literature DB >> 10862229

Chest pain with nondiagnostic electrocardiogram in the emergency department: a randomized controlled trial of two cardiac marker regimens.

E Dagnone1, C Collier, W Pickett, N Ali, M Miller, D Tod, R Morton.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Early detection of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) may save lives. In the emergency setting, it is unclear whether the early use of certain cardiac markers (myoglobin and cardiac troponin I [cTnI]) assists in making appropriate decisions whether to admit or discharge patients with chest pain of possible ischemic cause who have nondiagnostic electrocardiograms (ECGs). We performed a study to determine whether the addition of new cardiac markers in the emergency department results in improved clinical decisions.
METHODS: A single-blind randomized controlled trial was conducted between June 1997 and June 1998 in a tertiary care emergency department in Kingston, Ont. Of 296 patients aged 30 years or more who presented to the emergency department with chest pain and nondiagnostic ECGs, 146 were randomly assigned to the intervention group (determination of baseline creatine kinase [CK] level, CK MB fraction and cTnI level, and myoglobin level at baseline and at 2 hours) and 150 to the control group (determination of baseline CK level and CK MB fraction). Outcome measures included the rate of admission to the inpatient cardiology service and length of stay in the emergency department.
RESULTS: Of the 296 patients, 34 (11.5%) received a diagnosis of AMI in the emergency department, and 92 (31.1%) had chest pain of noncardiac cause. Patients in the intervention group were less likely than those in the control group to be admitted to the cardiology service (67 [45.9%] v. 81 [54.0%]). The absolute difference in the proportion (8.1% [95% confidence interval -3.3 to 19.5]), although potentially important clinically, was not statistically significant. The length of stay in the emergency department was essentially the same in the 2 study groups. At 30 days, the proportions of patients with a diagnosis of recurrent angina (58.2% in the intervention group and 58.0% in the control group) and AMI (12.3% and 14.7%) were also similar.
INTERPRETATION: The optimal cardiac marker panel to be used in the emergency department remains unknown. The addition of serial testing of myoglobin with cTnI confirmation to the standard panel did not substantially change the clinical management or outcomes of patients presenting with chest pain and nondiagnostic ECGs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10862229      PMCID: PMC1231335     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN: 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


  34 in total

1.  Serial creatine kinase-MB results are a sensitive indicator of acute myocardial infarction in chest pain patients with nondiagnostic electrocardiograms: the second Emergency Medicine Cardiac Research Group Study.

Authors:  G P Young; W B Gibler; J R Hedges; J W Hoekstra; C Slovis; R Aghababian; M Smith; M Rubison; J Ellis
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.451

2.  A computer protocol to predict myocardial infarction in emergency department patients with chest pain.

Authors:  L Goldman; E F Cook; D A Brand; T H Lee; G W Rouan; M C Weisberg; D Acampora; C Stasiulewicz; J Walshon; G Terranova
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1988-03-31       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Ruling out acute myocardial infarction. A prospective multicenter validation of a 12-hour strategy for patients at low risk.

Authors:  T H Lee; G Juarez; E F Cook; M C Weisberg; G W Rouan; D A Brand; L Goldman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-05-02       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Comprehensive strategy for the evaluation and triage of the chest pain patient.

Authors:  J L Tatum; R L Jesse; M C Kontos; C S Nicholson; K L Schmidt; C S Roberts; J P Ornato
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 5.721

Review 5.  The cardiac profile and proposed practice guideline for acute ischemic heart disease.

Authors:  J H Keffer
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 2.493

6.  A rapid diagnostic and treatment center for patients with chest pain in the emergency department.

Authors:  W B Gibler; J P Runyon; R C Levy; M R Sayre; R Kacich; C R Hattemer; C Hamilton; J W Gerlach; R A Walsh
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 5.721

7.  Non-Q-wave acute myocardial infarction: body surface potential map and ventriculographic patterns.

Authors:  T J Montague; D E Johnstone; C A Spencer; L D Lalonde; M J Gardner; M G O'Reilly; B M Horacek
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1986-12-01       Impact factor: 2.778

8.  Cardiac troponin T levels for risk stratification in acute myocardial ischemia. GUSTO IIA Investigators.

Authors:  E M Ohman; P W Armstrong; R H Christenson; C B Granger; H A Katus; C W Hamm; M A O'Hanesian; G S Wagner; N S Kleiman; F E Harrell; R M Califf; E J Topol
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1996-10-31       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Serial measurements of cardiac markers to rule in or out acute myocardial damage less than 3 h after admission in acute chest pain patients without ECG-signs of acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  M Stokke; T Grønvold; A M Siebke; O Skjaeggestad; J H Strømme
Journal:  Scand J Clin Lab Invest       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 1.713

10.  Candidates for thrombolysis among emergency room patients with acute chest pain. Potential true- and false-positive rates.

Authors:  T H Lee; M C Weisberg; D A Brand; G W Rouan; L Goldman
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1989-06-15       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  6 in total

1.  Cardiac markers for acute myocardial infarction: when should we test?

Authors:  H Dyan
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2000-10-31       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  The potential role for the use of cardiac computed tomography angiography for the acute chest pain patient in the emergency department.

Authors:  Sean R Wilson; James K Min
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  The effect of cardiac troponin testing on clinical care in a veterans population: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Michael Berkwits; A Russell Localio; Stephen E Kimmel
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Limitations of risk score models in patients with acute chest pain.

Authors:  Alex F Manini; Nina Dannemann; David F Brown; Javed Butler; Fabian Bamberg; John T Nagurney; John H Nichols; Udo Hoffmann
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.469

5.  Discrepancy between clinician and research assistant in TIMI score calculation (TRIAGED CPU).

Authors:  Brian T Taylor; Michelino Mancini
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2014-11-11

6.  Fragmented QRS and abnormal creatine kinase-MB are predictors of coronary artery disease in patients with angina and normal electrocardiographys.

Authors:  Jung Joo Lee; Jae Hoon Lee; Jin Woo Jeong; Jun Young Chung
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 2.884

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.