Literature DB >> 10861502

Epidemiologic determinants of clinically relevant prostate cancer.

M R Spitz1, S S Strom, Y Yamamura, P Troncoso, R J Babaian, P T Scardino, T Wheeler, C I Amos, A von Eschenbach, J Kagan.   

Abstract

While tumor volume and Gleason scores are the best available prognostic indicators for prostate cancer, contemporary predictive methods are unable to identify which men with Gleason scores of 7 have clinically insignificant tumors that will not progress and which men will develop highly aggressive prostate cancer. Our objective was to evaluate potential environmental determinants of significant prostate cancer. Subjects were patients identified from a university-based hospital and tertiary cancer center who had undergone radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Cases were 103 patients whose tumor volumes were </=0.5 ml. The comparison group was comprised of 225 men with larger-volume disease or with histologic evidence of extracapsular extension but without lymph node involvement. The matching criteria were ethnicity, age at diagnosis (+/-5 years), and date of diagnosis (+/-1 year). Epidemiologic data, current weight, and height were obtained. The comparison group was significantly more likely than cases to be current smokers (7.6% vs. 3.9%) and to report more pack-years smoked (30.1 vs. 23.0 years, p = 0.06). Cases tended to weigh less (85.2 vs. 87.1 kg, p = 0.1) and have lower body mass indices (26.8 vs. 27.6, p = 0.07). A similar trend was evident for weight at age 40 (79 vs. 81 kg). Cases reported a mean weight gain of 4.9 kg compared with 6. 6 kg in the comparison subjects (p = 0.05) between the ages of 25 and 40. There was no significant difference in weight gain from age 40 to current age. Cases were more likely to report having prostate cancer screening (90% vs. 80%, p = 0.02). Cases with Gleason scores </=7 (3 + 4, with 3 being the dominant grade) were younger at diagnosis than those with scores of 7 (4 + 3, with 4 being the dominant grade), were more likely (93%) to have had prostate screening, were less likely to be current smokers (4%), reported the fewest pack-years smoked (21.5 vs. 28.6 years for high-score cases and 30.1 for comparison subjects), and had the lowest average weight gain from ages 25 to 40 (4.62 vs. 6.31 kg for high-score cases). Weight gain in early adulthood and smoking thus appear to be important predictors of virulent prostate cancer. Our data also suggest that prior screening is associated with diagnosis of lower-volume and lower-score disease. Copyright 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10861502     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0215(20000520)89:3<259::aid-ijc8>3.0.co;2-f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  9 in total

1.  Significance of smoking status regarding outcomes after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Jong Jin Oh; Sung Kyu Hong; Chang Wook Jeong; Seok-Soo Byun; Sang Eun Lee
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2011-04-24       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 2.  Lifestyle and dietary factors in the prevention of lethal prostate cancer.

Authors:  Kathryn M Wilson; Edward L Giovannucci; Lorelei A Mucci
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 3.285

3.  Dietary energy balance modulates prostate cancer progression in Hi-Myc mice.

Authors:  Jorge Blando; Tricia Moore; Stephen Hursting; Guiyu Jiang; Achinto Saha; Linda Beltran; Jianjun Shen; John Repass; Sara Strom; John DiGiovanni
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2011-09-27

4.  Angiotensin-converting enzyme insertion/deletion polymorphism and the risk of prostate cancer in the Han population of China.

Authors:  Xiao Wang; Shuai Wang; Yi-wei Lin; Jian Wu; Hong Chen; Ye-qing Mao; Xiang-yi Zheng; Cheng Zhou; Li-ping Xie
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2011-08-28       Impact factor: 3.064

5.  Proinflammatory CXCL12-CXCR4/CXCR7 Signaling Axis Drives Myc-Induced Prostate Cancer in Obese Mice.

Authors:  Achinto Saha; Songyeon Ahn; Jorge Blando; Fei Su; Mikhail G Kolonin; John DiGiovanni
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2017-07-07       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  Weight gain is associated with an increased risk of prostate cancer recurrence after prostatectomy in the PSA era.

Authors:  Corinne E Joshu; Alison M Mondul; Andy Menke; Cari Meinhold; Misop Han; Elizabeth B Humphreys; Stephen J Freedland; Patrick C Walsh; Elizabeth A Platz
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2011-02-16

7.  Statin use and risk of prostate cancer: Results from the Southern Community Cohort Study.

Authors:  Elizabeth D Kantor; Loren Lipworth; Jay H Fowke; Edward L Giovannucci; Lorelei A Mucci; Lisa B Signorello
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 4.104

8.  Racial/ethnic differences in predictors of PSA screening in a tri-ethnic population.

Authors:  G M Monawar Hosain; Maureen Sanderson; Xianglin L Du; Wenyaw Chan; Sara S Strom
Journal:  Cent Eur J Public Health       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.163

Review 9.  White adipose tissue-derived factors and prostate cancer progression: mechanisms and targets for interventions.

Authors:  Achinto Saha; Jill Hamilton-Reeves; John DiGiovanni
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 9.237

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.