Literature DB >> 10860806

A mechanism for action of oscillating electric fields on cells.

D J Panagopoulos1, N Messini, A Karabarbounis, A L Philippetis, L H Margaritis.   

Abstract

The biological effects of electromagnetic fields have seriously concerned the scientific community and the public as well in the past decades as more and more evidence has accumulated about the hazardous consequences of so-called "electromagnetic pollution." This theoretical model is based on the simple hypothesis that an oscillating external electric field will exert an oscillating force to each of the free ions that exist on both sides of all plasma membranes and that can move across the membranes through transmembrane proteins. This external oscillating force will cause a forced vibration of each free ion. When the amplitude of the ions' forced vibration transcends some critical value, the oscillating ions can give a false signal for opening or closing channels that are voltage gated (or even mechanically gated), in this way disordering the electrochemical balance of the plasma membrane and consequently the whole cell function. Copyright 2000 Academic Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10860806     DOI: 10.1006/bbrc.2000.2746

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun        ISSN: 0006-291X            Impact factor:   3.575


  12 in total

1.  Biological cell-electrical field interaction: stochastic approach.

Authors:  A K Dubey; M Banerjee; Bikramjit Basu
Journal:  J Biol Phys       Date:  2010-08-17       Impact factor: 1.365

2.  Effects of pulsed electromagnetic fields on benign prostate hyperplasia.

Authors:  Xenophon K Giannakopoulos; Christos Giotis; Spyridon Ch Karkabounas; Ioannis I Verginadis; Yannis V Simos; Dimitrios Peschos; Angelos M Evangelou
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2011-05-03       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 3.  Evidence for a connection between coronavirus disease-19 and exposure to radiofrequency radiation from wireless communications including 5G.

Authors:  Beverly Rubik; Robert R Brown
Journal:  J Clin Transl Res       Date:  2021-09-29

4.  Osteoblastic differentiation and stress response of human mesenchymal stem cells exposed to alternating current electric fields.

Authors:  Marie Hronik-Tupaj; William L Rice; Mark Cronin-Golomb; David L Kaplan; Irene Georgakoudi
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 2.819

5.  Diverse radiofrequency sensitivity and radiofrequency effects of mobile or cordless phone near fields exposure in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Styliani Geronikolou; Stelios Zimeras; Constantinos H Davos; Ioannis Michalopoulos; Stephanos Tsitomeneas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-17       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Bioluminescence of Vibrio fischeri: bacteria respond quickly and sensitively to pulsed microwave electric (but not magnetic) fields.

Authors:  Catrin F Williams; Gilles M Geroni; David Lloyd; Heungjae Choi; Nicholas Clark; Antoine Pirog; Jonathan Lees; Adrian Porch
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 3.170

Review 7.  Human‑made electromagnetic fields: Ion forced‑oscillation and voltage‑gated ion channel dysfunction, oxidative stress and DNA damage (Review).

Authors:  Dimitris J Panagopoulos; Andreas Karabarbounis; Igor Yakymenko; George P Chrousos
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2021-10-07       Impact factor: 5.650

8.  Evaluation of specific absorption rate as a dosimetric quantity for electromagnetic fields bioeffects.

Authors:  Dimitris J Panagopoulos; Olle Johansson; George L Carlo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Comment on the "Ground water chemistry changes before major earthquakes and possible effects on animals", by R. A. Grant, T. Halliday, W. P. Balderer, F. Leuenberger, M. Newcomer, G. Cyr and F. T. Freund. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 2011, 8, 1936-1956.

Authors:  Vassiliki Katsika-Tsigourakou
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2012-07-02       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Polarization: A Key Difference between Man-made and Natural Electromagnetic Fields, in regard to Biological Activity.

Authors:  Dimitris J Panagopoulos; Olle Johansson; George L Carlo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.