Literature DB >> 10859875

[Quality of life assessment: validation of the Italian version of the WHOQOL-Brief].

G De Girolamo1, P Rucci, P Scocco, A Becchi, F Coppa, A D'Addario, E Darú, D De Leo, L Galassi, L Mangelli, C Marson, G Neri, L Soldani.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To test the psychometric properties of the Italian version of the WHOQOL-BRIEF (e.g., construct and internal validity, concurrent validity with the MOS SF-36 and test-retest reliability). The WHOQOL-BRIEF is a 26-items self-report instrument which assesses four domains assumed to represent the Quality Of Life (QOL) construct: physical domain, psychological domain, social relationships domain and environment domain, plus two facets for assessing overall QOL and general health.
METHODS: Data have been collected in three sites (Bologna, Modena and Padua), located in the North of Italy, in the framework of the international WHOQOL project. According to the study design, the sample had to include about 50% males and 50% females, 50% of subjects below and 50% above the age of 45, all in contact with various health services. A subsample has been re-interviewed after 2-3 weeks in order to study test-retest reliability. After the WHOQOL-BRIEF, most subjects have also been administered the MOS-SF36 in order to test the concurrent validity between these two instruments.
RESULTS: The instrument was administered to 379 subjects (1/6 healthy and 1/6 sick), chosen to be representative of a variety of different medical conditions. Seventy patients, who displayed stable health conditions, have been reassessed after 2-3 weeks to study test-retest reliability. The WHOQOL-BRIEF domains has shown good internal consistency, ranging from 0.65 for the social relationships domain to 0.80 for the physical domain; it has been able to discriminate between in- and out-patients and between the two age groups considered in the present study (< 45, > or = 45 years). Only physical and psychological domains were found to discriminate between healthy and ill subjects. No gender differences in the mean scores for the four domains were found. Concurrent validity between the WHOQOL-Brief and the MOS-SF-36 was satisfactory, and specific for the physical and psychological health domains. Test-retest reliability values were also good, ranging from 0.76 for the environment domain to 0.93 for the psychological domain.
CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that the WHOQOL-BRIEF is psychometrically valid and reliable, and that it is also potentially useful in discriminating between subjects with different health conditions in clinical settings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10859875     DOI: 10.1017/s1121189x00007740

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epidemiol Psichiatr Soc        ISSN: 1121-189X


  47 in total

1.  The suitability of the WHOQOL-BREF for Canadian and Norwegian older adults.

Authors:  Mary H Kalfoss; Gail Low; Anita E Molzahn
Journal:  Eur J Ageing       Date:  2008-02-13

2.  Integrated rehabilitation after total laryngectomy: a pilot trial study.

Authors:  Ylenia Longobardi; Vezio Savoia; Francesco Bussu; Luciana Morra; Giorgia Mari; Domenico A Nesci; Claudio Parrilla; Lucia D'Alatri
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2019-01-26       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Frailty and resilience in an older population. The role of resilience during rehabilitation after orthopedic surgery in geriatric patients with multiple comorbidities.

Authors:  G A A Rebagliati; L Sciumè; P Iannello; A Mottini; A Antonietti; V A Caserta; V Gattoronchieri; Lorenzo Panella; Camilla Callegari
Journal:  Funct Neurol       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep

4.  Quality of life, concern of falling and satisfaction of the sit-ski aid in sit-skiers with spinal cord injury: observational study.

Authors:  Adriano Ponti; Anna Berardi; Giovanni Galeoto; Luca Marchegiani; Cristina Spandonaro; Maria Auxiliadora Marquez
Journal:  Spinal Cord Ser Cases       Date:  2020-02-07

5.  The quality of life of the mentally ill living in residential facilities: findings from a national survey in Italy.

Authors:  Angelo Picardi; Paola Rucci; Giovanni de Girolamo; Giovanni Santone; Gabriele Borsetti; Pierluigi Morosini
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2006-06-20       Impact factor: 5.270

6.  Quality of life, alcohol detoxification and relapse: is quality of life a predictor of relapse or only a secondary outcome measure?

Authors:  Rocco Luigi Picci; Francesco Oliva; Marco Zuffranieri; Paola Vizzuso; Luca Ostacoli; Alessandro Jaretti Sodano; Pier Maria Furlan
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2014-06-15       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Clinical manifestations of highly prevalent corticosteroid-binding globulin mutations in a village in southern Italy.

Authors:  Giovanni Cizza; Livia Bernardi; Nicoletta Smirne; Raffaele Maletta; Carmine Tomaino; Angela Costanzo; Maura Gallo; John G Lewis; Silvana Geracitano; Maria Beatrice Grasso; Giuseppe Potenza; Cosimo Monteleone; Giacomino Brancati; Jui T Ho; David J Torpy; Amalia C Bruni
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 5.958

8.  Reliability and validity of the cross-culturally adapted Italian version of the Core Outcome Measures Index.

Authors:  A F Mannion; M Boneschi; M Teli; A Luca; F Zaina; S Negrini; P J Schulz
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Effects of dispositional optimism on quality of life, emotional distress and disability in Parkinson's disease outpatients under rehabilitation.

Authors:  Annalisa Gison; Federica Rizza; Stefano Bonassi; Valentina Donati; Salvatore Giaquinto
Journal:  Funct Neurol       Date:  2015 Apr-Jun

10.  Quality of life evaluation in patients affected by osteoarthritis secondary to congenital hip dysplasia after total hip replacement.

Authors:  Alessandra Tellini; Vincenza Ciccone; Davide Blonna; Roberto Rossi; Antongiulio Marmotti; Filippo Castoldi
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2008-08-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.