Literature DB >> 10859778

Generic assessment endpoints are needed for ecological risk assessment.

G W Suter1.   

Abstract

This article presents arguments for the development of generic assessment endpoints for ecological risk assessment. Generic assessment endpoints would be ecological entities and attributes that are assumed to be worthy of protection in most contexts. The existence of generic assessment endpoints would neither create a requirement that they be used in every assessment nor preclude the use of other assessment endpoints. They would simply be a starting point in the process of identifying the assessment endpoints for a particular assessment. They are needed to meet legal mandates, to provide a floor for environmental degradation, to provide some consistency in environmental regulation, as exemplars for site- or project-specific assessment endpoints, to allow development of methods and models, to give risk managers the courage to act, for screening and site-independent assessments, to support environmental monitoring, to facilitate communication, and to avoid paralysis by analysis. Generic assessment endpoints should include not only a list of entities and attributes, but also explanations of each endpoint, guidance on their use and interpretation, and measures and models that could be used to estimate them.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10859778     DOI: 10.1111/0272-4332.202018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Risk Anal        ISSN: 0272-4332            Impact factor:   4.000


  4 in total

1.  Ecological risk assessment and problem formulation for Lake Uluabat, a Ramsar State in Turkey.

Authors:  Guray Salihoglu; Feza Karaer
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Environmental change challenges decision-making during post-market environmental monitoring of transgenic crops.

Authors:  Olivier Sanvido; Jörg Romeis; Franz Bigler
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 2.788

3.  Linking ecosystem characteristics to final ecosystem services for public policy.

Authors:  Christina P Wong; Bo Jiang; Ann P Kinzig; Kai N Lee; Zhiyun Ouyang
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 9.492

4.  Problem formulation in the environmental risk assessment for genetically modified plants.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Wolt; Paul Keese; Alan Raybould; Julie W Fitzpatrick; Moisés Burachik; Alan Gray; Stephen S Olin; Joachim Schiemann; Mark Sears; Felicia Wu
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 2.788

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.