P Harris1, R Rees. 1. University of Wales Institute Cardiff, School of Health and Social Studies, Cardiff, UK. peharris@uwic.ac.uk
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To conduct a systematic review of published research investigating the prevalence of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use in the general population. DESIGN: A protocol was developed for a systematic review of survey literature identified using two bibliographic databases and citation tracking. The protocol specified criteria for: 1) database searches; 2) selection of studies for review; and 3) description of methodological and substantive aspects of the studies. RESULTS: Twelve studies were reviewed. These estimated the prevalence of CAM use in Australia, Canada, Finland, Israel, the UK, and the USA. The most rigorous studies, conducted in Australia and the USA, showed that a high proportion of the population was using CAM. There was evidence from the USA that CAM use increased significantly among the general population during the 1990s. CONCLUSION: CAM is used by substantial proportions of the general population of a number of countries, but differences in study design and methodological limitations make it difficult to compare prevalence estimates both within and between countries.
OBJECTIVE: To conduct a systematic review of published research investigating the prevalence of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use in the general population. DESIGN: A protocol was developed for a systematic review of survey literature identified using two bibliographic databases and citation tracking. The protocol specified criteria for: 1) database searches; 2) selection of studies for review; and 3) description of methodological and substantive aspects of the studies. RESULTS: Twelve studies were reviewed. These estimated the prevalence of CAM use in Australia, Canada, Finland, Israel, the UK, and the USA. The most rigorous studies, conducted in Australia and the USA, showed that a high proportion of the population was using CAM. There was evidence from the USA that CAM use increased significantly among the general population during the 1990s. CONCLUSION: CAM is used by substantial proportions of the general population of a number of countries, but differences in study design and methodological limitations make it difficult to compare prevalence estimates both within and between countries.
Authors: Cornelia Featherstone; David Godden; Caroline Gault; Margaret Emslie; Marc Took-Zozaya Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2003-07 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: S F Sencer; T Zhou; L S Freedman; J A Ives; Z Chen; D Wall; M L Nieder; S A Grupp; L C Yu; I Sahdev; W B Jonas; J D Wallace; M Oberbaum Journal: Bone Marrow Transplant Date: 2012-04-16 Impact factor: 5.483
Authors: Vincent C H Chung; Polly H X Ma; Chun Hong Lau; Samuel Y S Wong; Eng Kiong Yeoh; Sian M Griffiths Journal: Health Expect Date: 2012-05-31 Impact factor: 3.377
Authors: Sara A Quandt; Marja J Verhoef; Thomas A Arcury; George T Lewith; Aslak Steinsbekk; Agnete E Kristoffersen; Dietlind L Wahner-Roedler; Vinjar Fønnebø Journal: J Altern Complement Med Date: 2009-04 Impact factor: 2.579