Literature DB >> 10859097

Conversion of external fixation to intramedullary nailing for fractures of the shaft of the femur in multiply injured patients.

P J Nowotarski1, C H Turen, R J Brumback, J M Scarboro.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: From 1989 to 1997, 1507 fractures of the shaft of the femur were treated with intramedullary nailing at The R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center. Fifty-nine (4 percent) of those fractures were treated with early external fixation followed by planned conversion to intramedullary nail fixation. This two-stage stabilization protocol was selected for patients who were critically ill and poor candidates for an immediate intramedullary procedure or who required expedient femoral fixation followed by repair of an ipsilateral vascular injury. The purpose of the current investigation was to determine whether this protocol is an appropriate alternative for the management of fractures of the femur in patients who are poor candidates for immediate intramedullary nailing.
METHODS: Fifty-four multiply injured patients with a total of fifty-nine fractures of the shaft of the femur treated with external fixation followed by planned conversion to intramedullary nail fixation were evaluated in a retrospective review to gather demographic, injury, management, and fracture-healing data for analysis.
RESULTS: The average Injury Severity Score for the fifty-four patients was 29 (range, 13 to 43); the average Glasgow Coma Scale score was 11 (range, 3 to 15). Most patients (forty-four) had additional orthopaedic injuries (average, three; range, zero to eight), and associated injuries such as severe brain injury, solid-organ rupture, chest trauma, and aortic tears were common. Forty fractures were closed, and nineteen fractures were open. According to the system of Gustilo and Anderson, three of the open fractures were type II, eight were type IIIA, and eight were type IIIC. Intramedullary nailing was delayed secondary to medical instability in forty-six patients and secondary to vascular injury in eight. All fractures of the shaft of the femur were stabilized with a unilateral external fixator within the first twenty-four hours after the injury; the average duration of the procedure was thirty minutes. The duration of external fixation averaged seven days (range, one to forty-nine days) before the fixation with the static interlocked intramedullary nail. Forty-nine of the nailing procedures were antegrade, and ten were retrograde. For fifty-five of the fifty-nine fractures, the external fixation was converted to intramedullary nail fixation in a one-stage procedure. The other four fractures were associated with draining pin sites, and skeletal traction to allow pin-site healing was used for an average of ten days (range, eight to fifteen days) after fixator removal and before intramedullary nailing. Follow-up averaged twelve months (range, six to eighty-seven months). Of the fifty-eight fractures available for follow-up until union, fifty-six (97 percent) healed within six months. There were three major complications: one patient died from a pulmonary embolism before union, one patient had a refractory infected nonunion, and one patient had a nonunion with nail failure, which was successfully treated with retrograde exchange nailing. The infection rate was 1.7 percent. Four other patients required a minor reoperation: two were managed with manipulation under anesthesia because of knee stiffness, and two underwent derotation and relocking of the nail because of rotational malalignment. The rate of unplanned reoperations was 11 percent. The average range of motion of the knee was 107 degrees (range, 60 to 140 degrees).
CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that immediate external fixation followed by early closed intramedullary nailing is a safe treatment method for fractures of the shaft of the femur in selected multiply injured patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10859097

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  40 in total

Review 1.  [Damage control orthopedics].

Authors:  D Nast-Kolb; S Ruchholtz; C Waydhas; B Schmidt; G Taeger
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  [Clinical results with A new retrograde femoral nail with a radiographical-free proximal locking device. A prospective study with 50 fractures].

Authors:  B Friemert; P Keppler; F von Lübken; C Willy; L Claes; H Gerngross; D Wörz
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  S-osteotomy with lengthening and then nailing compared with traditional Ilizarov method.

Authors:  Xia Lan; Lihai Zhang; Peifu Tang; Hetao Xia; Gang Li; Aiming Peng; Yilian Han; Bangtuo Yuan; Wenpeng Xu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Limb lengthening and then insertion of an intramedullary nail: a case-matched comparison.

Authors:  S Robert Rozbruch; Dawn Kleinman; Austin T Fragomen; Svetlana Ilizarov
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-09-18       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 5.  Intramedullary nailing after external fixation of the femur and tibia: a review of advantages and limits.

Authors:  P Pairon; C Ossendorf; S Kuhn; A Hofmann; P M Rommens
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 3.693

6.  Impact of the method of initial stabilization for femoral shaft fractures in patients with multiple injuries at risk for complications (borderline patients).

Authors:  Hans-Christoph Pape; Dieter Rixen; John Morley; Elisabeth Ellingsen Husebye; Michael Mueller; Clemens Dumont; Andreas Gruner; Hans Joerg Oestern; Michael Bayeff-Filoff; Christina Garving; Dustin Pardini; Martijn van Griensven; Christian Krettek; Peter Giannoudis
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 7.  [Traumatic brain injury: impact on timing and modality of fracture care].

Authors:  P F Stahel; W Ertel; C E Heyde
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.087

8.  Intramedullary nailing of femoral and tibial shaft fractures.

Authors:  George W Wood
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2006-12-04       Impact factor: 1.601

Review 9.  [Decision making and and priorities for surgical treatment during and after shock trauma room treatment].

Authors:  H C Pape; F Hildebrand; C Krettek
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.000

10.  Treatment principles in the management of open fractures.

Authors:  William W Cross; Marc F Swiontkowski
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.251

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.