Literature DB >> 10858662

Organellar genes: why do they end up in the nucleus?

J L Blanchard1, M Lynch.   

Abstract

Many mitochondrial and plastid proteins are derived from their bacterial endosymbiotic ancestors, but their genes now reside on nuclear chromosomes instead of remaining within the organelle. To become an active nuclear gene and return to the organelle as a functional protein, an organellar gene must first be assimilated into the nuclear genome. The gene must then be transcribed and acquire a transit sequence for targeting the protein back to the organelle. On reaching the organelle, the protein must be properly folded and modified, and in many cases assembled in an orderly manner into a larger protein complex. Finally, the nuclear copy must be properly regulated to achieve a fitness level comparable with the organellar gene. Given the complexity in establishing a nuclear copy, why do organellar genes end up in the nucleus? Recent data suggest that these genes are worse off than their nuclear and free-living counterparts because of a reduction in the efficiency of natural selection, but do these population-genetic processes drive the movement of genes to the nucleus? We are now at a stage where we can begin to discriminate between competing hypotheses using a combination of experimental, natural population, bioinformatic and theoretical approaches.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10858662     DOI: 10.1016/s0168-9525(00)02053-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Genet        ISSN: 0168-9525            Impact factor:   11.639


  45 in total

1.  Many parallel losses of infA from chloroplast DNA during angiosperm evolution with multiple independent transfers to the nucleus.

Authors:  R S Millen; R G Olmstead; K L Adams; J D Palmer; N T Lao; L Heggie; T A Kavanagh; J M Hibberd; J C Gray; C W Morden; P J Calie; L S Jermiin; K H Wolfe
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 11.277

Review 2.  Dynamic evolution of plant mitochondrial genomes: mobile genes and introns and highly variable mutation rates.

Authors:  J D Palmer; K L Adams; Y Cho; C L Parkinson; Y L Qiu; K Song
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-06-20       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Small, repetitive DNAs contribute significantly to the expanded mitochondrial genome of cucumber.

Authors:  J W Lilly; M J Havey
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Pattern of organization of human mitochondrial pseudogenes in the nuclear genome.

Authors:  Markus Woischnik; Carlos T Moraes
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 5.  Genomes at the interface between bacteria and organelles.

Authors:  Angela E Douglas; John A Raven
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2003-01-29       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  High-frequency gene transfer from the chloroplast genome to the nucleus.

Authors:  Sandra Stegemann; Stefanie Hartmann; Stephanie Ruf; Ralph Bock
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-06-19       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Intracellular gene transfer: reduced hydrophobicity facilitates gene transfer for subunit 2 of cytochrome c oxidase.

Authors:  Daniel O Daley; Rachel Clifton; James Whelan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-07-25       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Evidence that plant-like genes in Chlamydia species reflect an ancestral relationship between Chlamydiaceae, cyanobacteria, and the chloroplast.

Authors:  Fiona S L Brinkman; Jeffrey L Blanchard; Artem Cherkasov; Yossef Av-Gay; Robert C Brunham; Rachel C Fernandez; B Brett Finlay; Sarah P Otto; B F Francis Ouellette; Patrick J Keeling; Ann M Rose; Robert E W Hancock; Steven J M Jones; Hans Greberg
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 9.043

9.  Covariation of mitochondrial genome size with gene lengths: evidence for gene length reduction during mitochondrial evolution.

Authors:  André Schneider; Dieter Ebert
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.395

10.  Heteroplasmy suggests paternal co-transmission of multiple genomes and pervasive reversion of maternally into paternally transmitted genomes of mussel (Mytilus) mitochondrial DNA.

Authors:  Humberto Quesada; Heiko Stuckas; David O F Skibinski
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.395

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.