Literature DB >> 1085815

Sound localization in anurans. I. Evidence of binaural interaction in dorsal medullary nucleus of bullfrogs (Rana catesbeiana).

A S Feng, R R Capranica.   

Abstract

1. The response patterns of single cells to monaural and binaural acoustic stimuli were studied in the dorsal medullary nucleus of the bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana). This nucleus represents the first ascending center in the anuran's central auditory nervous system. 2. Of the 142 cells isolated, 75 units responded only to monaural stimulation. Approximately 80% of these monaural cells could be excited by the ipsilateral ear, while the remaining 20% received their excitatory input from the contralateral ear. The other 67 units responded to binaural stimuli. Of these binaural cells, 14 could be excited by either contralateral or ipsilateral stimuli, and the threshold and best excitatory frequency were similar for each ear (EE). The other 53 binaural cells (EI) could be excited by stimulation of one ear and inhibited by stimulation of the other ear; for almost all of these cells the contralateral ear was excitatory and the ipsilateral ear was inhibitory. The best inhibitory frequency for one ear was approximately the same as the best excitatory frequency for the other ear, and the threshold for inhibition was near the threshold for excitation. 3. The tuning curves for all of the cells in the dorsal medullary nucleus were unimodal with "Q" values ranging from 0.4 to 4. The excitatory thresholds were widely scattered between 22 and 115 dB SPL. 4. The distribution of best excitatory frequencies for the monaural cells comprised three groups: 200-300, 500-800, and 900-1,600 Hz. The best excitatory frequencies of the binaural cells were scattered over this entire range, with a broad peak around 200-800 Hz. 5. Approximately 80% of the cells in the dorsal nucleus responded tonically throughout the duration of an excitatory tone burst. The remaining 20% of the cells responded phasically during the transient stages of a tone burst over a wide intensity range. 6. Response latencies were compared for the two types of monaural cells to tones at their best exciatatory frequencies at 10 dB above threshold. The latencies for the contralaterally excitable cells were just a few milliseconds longer than the latencies for the ipsilaterally excitable cells. For binaural cells the latency for contralateral stimulation was only 1-2 ms longer than for ipsilateral stimulation. It was concluded that the contralateral input to the dorsal medullary nucleus is not of efferent descending origin from higher auditory centers. 7. All of the binaural EI cells were sensitive to small interaural intensity differences and many were also sensitive to minute interaural time differences. These cells likely play a role in localization of sounds of significance to anurans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1976        PMID: 1085815     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1976.39.4.871

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  13 in total

1.  GABA is involved in spatial unmasking in the frog auditory midbrain.

Authors:  Wen-Yu Lin; Albert S Feng
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-09-03       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  Evolution of a sensory novelty: tympanic ears and the associated neural processing.

Authors:  Jakob Christensen-Dalsgaard; Catherine E Carr
Journal:  Brain Res Bull       Date:  2007-11-20       Impact factor: 4.077

3.  Effects of sound direction on the processing of amplitude-modulated signals in the frog inferior colliculus.

Authors:  J Xu; D M Gooler; A S Feng
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Binaural processing by the gecko auditory periphery.

Authors:  Jakob Christensen-Dalsgaard; Yezhong Tang; Catherine E Carr
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 5.  Sound source localization and segregation with internally coupled ears: the treefrog model.

Authors:  Mark A Bee; Jakob Christensen-Dalsgaard
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 2.086

6.  Auditory brainstem responses in Cope's gray treefrog (Hyla chrysoscelis): effects of frequency, level, sex and size.

Authors:  Katrina M Schrode; Nathan P Buerkle; Elizabeth F Brittan-Powell; Mark A Bee
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2014-01-18       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Tone and call responses of units in the auditory nerve and dorsal medullary nucleus of Xenopus laevis.

Authors:  Taffeta M Elliott; Jakob Christensen-Dalsgaard; Darcy B Kelley
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2007-11-08       Impact factor: 1.836

8.  Spatial and spectral dependence of the auditory periphery in the northern leopard frog.

Authors:  J Wang; T A Ludwig; P M Narins
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 1.836

9.  Correlation between auditory evoked responses in the thalamus and species-specific call characteristics. I. Rana catesbeiana (Anura: Ranidae).

Authors:  K M Mudry; R R Capranica
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 1.836

10.  Evolution of Sound Source Localization Circuits in the Nonmammalian Vertebrate Brainstem.

Authors:  Peggy L Walton; Jakob Christensen-Dalsgaard; Catherine E Carr
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  2017-10-09       Impact factor: 1.808

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.