INTRODUCTION: Cooled radiofrequency ablation has been developed clinically for the treatment of ventricular tachycardia. Although clinical studies employ a constant saline flow rate for cooling, we hypothesized that varying the flow rates might optimize the temperature profile at depth. METHODS: In excised ovine left ventricle, we compared the temperature profile from a catheter tip electrode thermocouple to those placed at depths of 0.0 mm, 1.0 mm, and 2.0 mm. We compared the following settings: 20 Watts without flow, 20 Watts with 0.3 cc/sec flow, 20 Watts with 0.5cc/sec flow, and 70C surface temperature without flow (temperature control). RESULTS: The temperatures decreased from 77.5 +/-10.5 degrees C, 91.7+/-6.3 degrees C, 65.5 +/- 11.8 degrees C, and 52.5 +/- 11.8 degrees C at 20W without saline irrigation at the tip, 0.0mm, 1.0mm, and 2.0 mm, respectively, to 33.0+/-1.4 degrees C, 63.4 +/- 7.0 degrees C, 57.1+/-5.8 degrees C, 49.9+/-5.8 degrees C+ at 20W with 0.5 ml/sec flow (*p<0.01, +p = 0.09). The lesion volumes were 79.6mm3 for 20W without flow, 64.1 mm3 for 20W with 0.3 ml/sec flow, 47.5 mm3 for 20W with 0.5 ml/sec flow, and 28.6 mm3 for temperature control. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that 1) the temperature profile greatly depends upon the rate of saline flow for cooling; 2) at high flow rates, the 0.0 mm and 1.0 mm temperatures are similar; 3) even at high irrigation rates, lesion size is greater than for temperature control; 4) the tip temperature significantly underestimates the surface temperature and improved methods of measuring temperature are needed.
INTRODUCTION: Cooled radiofrequency ablation has been developed clinically for the treatment of ventricular tachycardia. Although clinical studies employ a constant saline flow rate for cooling, we hypothesized that varying the flow rates might optimize the temperature profile at depth. METHODS: In excised ovine left ventricle, we compared the temperature profile from a catheter tip electrode thermocouple to those placed at depths of 0.0 mm, 1.0 mm, and 2.0 mm. We compared the following settings: 20 Watts without flow, 20 Watts with 0.3 cc/sec flow, 20 Watts with 0.5cc/sec flow, and 70C surface temperature without flow (temperature control). RESULTS: The temperatures decreased from 77.5 +/-10.5 degrees C, 91.7+/-6.3 degrees C, 65.5 +/- 11.8 degrees C, and 52.5 +/- 11.8 degrees C at 20W without saline irrigation at the tip, 0.0mm, 1.0mm, and 2.0 mm, respectively, to 33.0+/-1.4 degrees C, 63.4 +/- 7.0 degrees C, 57.1+/-5.8 degrees C, 49.9+/-5.8 degrees C+ at 20W with 0.5 ml/sec flow (*p<0.01, +p = 0.09). The lesion volumes were 79.6mm3 for 20W without flow, 64.1 mm3 for 20W with 0.3 ml/sec flow, 47.5 mm3 for 20W with 0.5 ml/sec flow, and 28.6 mm3 for temperature control. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that 1) the temperature profile greatly depends upon the rate of saline flow for cooling; 2) at high flow rates, the 0.0 mm and 1.0 mm temperatures are similar; 3) even at high irrigation rates, lesion size is greater than for temperature control; 4) the tip temperature significantly underestimates the surface temperature and improved methods of measuring temperature are needed.
Authors: W M Jackman; X Z Wang; K J Friday; C A Roman; K P Moulton; K J Beckman; J H McClelland; N Twidale; H A Hazlitt; M I Prior Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1991-06-06 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: H Calkins; J Sousa; R el-Atassi; S Rosenheck; M de Buitleir; W H Kou; A H Kadish; J J Langberg; F Morady Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1991-06-06 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: R S Mittleman; S K Huang; W T de Guzman; H Cuénoud; A B Wagshal; L A Pires Journal: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol Date: 1995-05 Impact factor: 1.976
Authors: B Avitall; M Khan; D Krum; J Hare; C Lessila; A Dhala; S Deshpande; M Jazayeri; J Sra; M Akhtar Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 1993-09 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: M D Lesh; G F Van Hare; D J Schamp; W Chien; M A Lee; J C Griffin; J J Langberg; T J Cohen; K G Lurie; M M Scheinman Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 1992-05 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: H Nakagawa; W S Yamanashi; J V Pitha; M Arruda; X Wang; K Ohtomo; K J Beckman; J H McClelland; R Lazzara; W M Jackman Journal: Circulation Date: 1995-04-15 Impact factor: 29.690