OBJECTIVE: Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) affects 0.25-1.0% of the population, and its etiology is incompletely understood. Susceptibility to this highly familial disease (lambda(s) = 58) is primarily genetically determined. There is a significant sex bias in AS, and there are differences in recurrence risk to the offspring of affected mothers and fathers, suggesting that there may be an X-linked recessive effect. We undertook an X-chromosome linkage study to determine any contribution of the X-chromosome to AS susceptibility. METHODS: A linkage study of the X-chromosome using 234 affected sibling pairs was performed to investigate this hypothesis. RESULTS: No linkage of the X-chromosome with susceptibility to AS was found. Model-free multipoint linkage analysis strongly excluded any significant genetic contribution (lambda > or = 1.5) to AS susceptibility encoded on the X-chromosome (logarithm of odds [LOD] <-2.0). Smaller genetic effects (lambda > or = 1.3) were also found to be unlikely (LOD <-1.0). CONCLUSION: The sex bias in AS is not explained by X-chromosome-encoded genetic effects. The disease model best explaining the sex bias in occurrence and transmission of AS is a polygenic model with a higher susceptibility threshold in females.
OBJECTIVE:Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) affects 0.25-1.0% of the population, and its etiology is incompletely understood. Susceptibility to this highly familial disease (lambda(s) = 58) is primarily genetically determined. There is a significant sex bias in AS, and there are differences in recurrence risk to the offspring of affected mothers and fathers, suggesting that there may be an X-linked recessive effect. We undertook an X-chromosome linkage study to determine any contribution of the X-chromosome to AS susceptibility. METHODS: A linkage study of the X-chromosome using 234 affected sibling pairs was performed to investigate this hypothesis. RESULTS: No linkage of the X-chromosome with susceptibility to AS was found. Model-free multipoint linkage analysis strongly excluded any significant genetic contribution (lambda > or = 1.5) to AS susceptibility encoded on the X-chromosome (logarithm of odds [LOD] <-2.0). Smaller genetic effects (lambda > or = 1.3) were also found to be unlikely (LOD <-1.0). CONCLUSION: The sex bias in AS is not explained by X-chromosome-encoded genetic effects. The disease model best explaining the sex bias in occurrence and transmission of AS is a polygenic model with a higher susceptibility threshold in females.
Authors: S H Laval; A Timms; S Edwards; L Bradbury; S Brophy; A Milicic; L Rubin; K A Siminovitch; D E Weeks; A Calin; B P Wordsworth; M A Brown Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2001-02-27 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Wonuk Lee; John D Reveille; John C Davis; Thomas J Learch; Michael M Ward; Michael H Weisman Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2006-11-24 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: Michela Traglia; Dina Bseiso; Alexander Gusev; Brigid Adviento; Daniel S Park; Joel A Mefford; Noah Zaitlen; Lauren A Weiss Journal: Genetics Date: 2016-12-14 Impact factor: 4.562
Authors: Hing Wo Tsui; Robert D Inman; Andrew D Paterson; John D Reveille; Florence W L Tsui Journal: Arthritis Res Ther Date: 2005-02-25 Impact factor: 5.156
Authors: Hye Won Kim; Hye Rim Choe; Su Bin Lee; Won Ik Chang; Hyun Jun Chae; Jin Young Moon; Jisue Kang; Sungim Lee; Yeong Wook Song; Eun Young Lee Journal: J Korean Med Sci Date: 2014-05-30 Impact factor: 2.153