Literature DB >> 10857512

Searching for rehabilitation articles on MEDLINE and EMBASE. An example with cross-over design.

S Minozzi1, V Pistotti, M Forni.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the usefulness of MEDLINE and EMBASE biomedical databases in rehabilitation and to identify descriptors and text words necessary to do a comprehensive search.
METHODS: We looked for articles published since 1990 relating to neurologic, orthopedic, respiratory, urologic, and rheumatologic rehabilitation. We looked for all descriptors and text words pertinent to rehabilitation and linked them with "cross-over."
RESULTS: We found 165 articles in MEDLINE and 159 in EMBASE with an overlap of only 17% of articles. Only 32% of the articles in MEDLINE and 35% in EMBASE were relevant. Of the 214 nonoverlapping articles, 84% were published in journals present in both databases, but were indexed differently.
CONCLUSION: At least two databases must be used to ensure a comprehensive literature search. Searching in EMBASE after MEDLINE we gained 25 articles (32%). Bibliographic search in rehabilitation is particularly complex because of the heterogeneity of the subject matter. Cooperation between an information professional and a clinician is essential to ensure a comprehensive search.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10857512     DOI: 10.1016/s0003-9993(00)90099-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  9 in total

1.  Literature search parameters marginally improved the pooled estimate accuracy for ultrasound in detecting deep venous thrombosis.

Authors:  Behrouz Kassaï; Sandrine Sonié; Nirav R Shah; Jean-Pierre Boissel
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  Developing optimal search strategies for detecting clinically sound treatment studies in EMBASE.

Authors:  Sharon S-L Wong; Nancy L Wilczynski; R Brian Haynes
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2006-01

3.  EMBASE versus MEDLINE for family medicine searches: can MEDLINE searches find the forest or a tree?

Authors:  Thad Wilkins; Ralph A Gillies; Kathy Davies
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 4.  What to call spinal cord damage not due to trauma? Implications for literature searching.

Authors:  Peter W New; Veronica Delafosse
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2012-02-06       Impact factor: 1.985

Review 5.  Exercise prescription after fragility fracture in older adults: a scoping review.

Authors:  L M Feehan; C A Beck; S R Harris; D L MacIntyre; L C Li
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 6.  Which resources should be used to identify RCT/CCTs for systematic reviews: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ellen T Crumley; Natasha Wiebe; Kristie Cramer; Terry P Klassen; Lisa Hartling
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2005-08-10       Impact factor: 4.615

7.  Optimizing literature search in systematic reviews - are MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL enough for identifying effect studies within the area of musculoskeletal disorders?

Authors:  Thomas Aagaard; Hans Lund; Carsten Juhl
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 4.615

8.  Is the coverage of Google Scholar enough to be used alone for systematic reviews.

Authors:  Jean-François Gehanno; Laetitia Rollin; Stefan Darmoni
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 2.796

9.  Enhancing access to reports of randomized trials published world-wide--the contribution of EMBASE records to the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in The Cochrane Library.

Authors:  Carol Lefebvre; Anne Eisinga; Steve McDonald; Nina Paul
Journal:  Emerg Themes Epidemiol       Date:  2008-09-30
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.