Literature DB >> 10856858

Risk analysis for thoracoscopic lung volume reduction: a multi-institutional experience.

K S Naunheim1, S R Hazelrigg, L R Kaiser, R J Keenan, J E Bavaria, R J Landreneau, J Osterloh, C A Keller.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Most reports of thoracoscopic lung volume reduction (TLVR) are relatively small and early experiences from a single institution, factors which limit both the statistical validity and the applicability to the population at large. In order to address these shortcomings we undertook an analysis of the TLVR experience at five separate institutions to assess operative morbidity and identify predictors of mortality.
METHODS: Questionnaires were sent to four groups of surgical investigators at five institutions actively performing TLVR. Data was requested regarding preoperative, operative and postoperative parameters. Twenty-five potential predictors of mortality were analyzed and seven proved to be at least marginally significant (P<0.10). These parameters were entered into a stepwise logistic regression analysis to identify independent predictors.
RESULTS: The 682 patients (415 males, 267 females, mean age 64.0 years) underwent unilateral (410) or bilateral (272) TLVRs. Overall, operative mortality was 6% with half of the deaths resulting from respiratory causes. The remaining patients were discharged to home (88%), a rehabilitation facility (4%) or a ventilator facility (2%). There were 25 perioperative factors chosen representing clinically important indices such as spirometry, oxygenation, functional status, clinical and demographic variables. Univariate analysis identified seven variables as predictors of mortality (P<0.10) and these were entered into a stepwise logistic regression analysis. Only age, 6-min walk, gender (male 8%, female 3% mortality) and the procedure performed (unilateral 4.6%, bilateral 8%) were independent predictors while preoperative steroid therapy, preoperative oxygen administration, and time since smoking cessation dropped out of the model. The specific institution, learning curve (early vs. late experience), type of lung disease, spirometric indices and predicted maximum VO(2) were not significant predictors.
CONCLUSION: This experience suggests that unilateral and bilateral lung volume reduction procedure can be performed with acceptable morbidity and mortality. Although age, gender, exercise capacity and the procedure performed are all independent predictors of mortality, the risk of operative death did not appear excessive in this fragile patient subset.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10856858     DOI: 10.1016/s1010-7940(00)00450-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  4 in total

Review 1.  Preoperative predictors of outcome following lung volume reduction surgery.

Authors:  F C Sciurba
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 9.139

Review 2.  Postoperative complications and management after lung volume reduction surgery.

Authors:  Max Lacour; Claudio Caviezel; Walter Weder; Didier Schneiter
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 3.  Anesthetic considerations in candidates for lung volume reduction surgery.

Authors:  Neil W Brister; Rodger E Barnette; Victor Kim; Michael Keresztury
Journal:  Proc Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2008-05-01

Review 4.  Lung volume reduction surgery: technique, operative mortality, and morbidity.

Authors:  Malcolm M DeCamp; Robert J McKenna; Claude C Deschamps; Mark J Krasna
Journal:  Proc Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2008-05-01
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.