Introduction: Ambulatory Surgery has emerged and developed in Spain in a similar way as in other occidental countries. Once established as a model for surgical care, results must be improved using objective quality indicators to assure minimal morbidity, efficient use of resources and satisfaction of patients and family. Objective: To provide a list of quality assessment indicators in Ambulatory Surgery and to discuss the necessity of obtaining a general consensus regarding the complexity of both the operations and the patients undergoing surgery. Design: Prospective and descriptive study. Patients and Methods: The study was performed on 833 ambulatory patients operated on in the Ambulatory Surgical Unit of the Can Misses Hospital of Ibiza. Surgical specialities involved were General Surgery, Ophthalmology, Orthopaedics, Urology, Gynaecology, and E.N.T. All diagnoses and proceedings were classified according to the CIE-9 and DGR systems, showing as an example the codes related to the General Surgery department. Quality Indicators evaluated were: (a) unplanned admission index; (b) re-admission index; (c) emergency department consultations; (d) cancellation index; (e) substitution index; and (f) postoperative pain evaluation. Results: Specialities involved were: Ophthalmology 277 patients (33.2%), General Surgery 189 (22.8%), Orthopaedics 142 (17%), Urology 90 (10.8%), E.N.T. 79 (9.5%) and Gynaecology 56 (6.7%). Unplanned Admission Index was 7.2%; Re-Admission Index 0.4%; Emergency department consultation 1.6%; Cancellation Index 3.3% and Substitution Index 70%. The reasons for unplanned admission were due to specific complications in 36 cases (60.1%), followed by those secondary to an inadequate selection of the patient in 22 cases (36.6%). Conclusions: It is necessary to apply a series of Quality Indicators in Ambulatory Surgery. Their systematic evaluation may help us define national standards in order to continuously improve our results.
Introduction: Ambulatory Surgery has emerged and developed in Spain in a similar way as in other occidental countries. Once established as a model for surgical care, results must be improved using objective quality indicators to assure minimal morbidity, efficient use of resources and satisfaction of patients and family. Objective: To provide a list of quality assessment indicators in Ambulatory Surgery and to discuss the necessity of obtaining a general consensus regarding the complexity of both the operations and the patients undergoing surgery. Design: Prospective and descriptive study. Patients and Methods: The study was performed on 833 ambulatory patients operated on in the Ambulatory Surgical Unit of the Can Misses Hospital of Ibiza. Surgical specialities involved were General Surgery, Ophthalmology, Orthopaedics, Urology, Gynaecology, and E.N.T. All diagnoses and proceedings were classified according to the CIE-9 and DGR systems, showing as an example the codes related to the General Surgery department. Quality Indicators evaluated were: (a) unplanned admission index; (b) re-admission index; (c) emergency department consultations; (d) cancellation index; (e) substitution index; and (f) postoperative pain evaluation. Results: Specialities involved were: Ophthalmology 277 patients (33.2%), General Surgery 189 (22.8%), Orthopaedics 142 (17%), Urology 90 (10.8%), E.N.T. 79 (9.5%) and Gynaecology 56 (6.7%). Unplanned Admission Index was 7.2%; Re-Admission Index 0.4%; Emergency department consultation 1.6%; Cancellation Index 3.3% and Substitution Index 70%. The reasons for unplanned admission were due to specific complications in 36 cases (60.1%), followed by those secondary to an inadequate selection of the patient in 22 cases (36.6%). Conclusions: It is necessary to apply a series of Quality Indicators in Ambulatory Surgery. Their systematic evaluation may help us define national standards in order to continuously improve our results.