Literature DB >> 10856782

Strategies for the avoidance of faeces by grazing sheep.

.   

Abstract

Experiments were conducted to investigate which environmental cues were used by sheep when discriminating against patches of pasture contaminated with faeces. The influence of the spatial distribution of contaminated patches and the parasite infection status of sheep on avoidance of contaminated patches and ingestion of parasite larvae was also investigated. In experiment 1, sheep infected with the parasite Ostertagia circumcincta were given the opportunity to graze in uncontaminated or aggregated contaminated patches. Patch contamination comprised of either faeces from sheep infected with O. circumcincta larvae, faeces from uninfected sheep, or O. circumcincta larvae only. Infected sheep discriminated against faeces from parasite-infected animals and faeces from uninfected animals equally. Sheep did not discriminate against patches contaminated with parasite larvae only. In experiment 2, sheep infected with O. circumcincta and uninfected sheep grazed experimental plots with differing spatial patterns of faecal-contaminated patches, allowing animals the opportunity to forage in contaminated or uncontaminated patches of herbage. Plots were also grazed by infected and uninfected animals that were fistulated at the oesophagus to enable the collection of ingested herbage. Sheep spent a greater proportion of their time foraging in uncontaminated patches than in contaminated patches. Where patches were highly aggregated, infected animals spent a greater proportion of total grazing time in uncontaminated patches than did uninfected animals, and grazed uncontaminated patches for longer on each sampling occasion. On grazing plots where all patches were contaminated, the difference between the numbers of larvae isolated from pasture herbage and ingested herbage was greatest for infected animals. In this situation, infected animals avoided parasites most. On grazing plots consisting of both contaminated and uncontaminated patches, the difference between the numbers of larvae isolated from pasture herbage and ingested herbage was greatest for uninfected animals. In this situation, uninfected animals were most effective at parasite avoidance as they consumed fewer parasite larvae relative to what was available on pasture.

Entities:  

Year:  2000        PMID: 10856782     DOI: 10.1016/s0168-1591(00)00116-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Anim Behav Sci        ISSN: 0168-1591            Impact factor:   2.448


  14 in total

1.  Soil and plant contamination with Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis after exposure to naturally contaminated mouflon feces.

Authors:  Radka Pribylova; Iva Slana; Marija Kaevska; Jiri Lamka; Vladimir Babak; Jiri Jandak; Ivo Pavlik
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2011-01-29       Impact factor: 2.188

2.  Feeding decisions under contamination risk in bonobos.

Authors:  Cecile Sarabian; Raphael Belais; Andrew J J MacIntosh
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Effects of parasite pressure on parasite mortality and reproductive output in a rodent-flea system: inferring host defense trade-offs.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Warburton; Michael Kam; Enav Bar-Shira; Aharon Friedman; Irina S Khokhlova; Lee Koren; Mustafa Asfur; Eli Geffen; Daniel Kiefer; Boris R Krasnov; A Allan Degen
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2016-04-30       Impact factor: 2.289

Review 4.  Human threat management systems: self-protection and disease avoidance.

Authors:  Steven L Neuberg; Douglas T Kenrick; Mark Schaller
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 8.989

5.  Hygienic personalities in wild grey mouse lemurs vary adaptively with sex.

Authors:  Clémence Poirotte; Peter M Kappeler
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Hygienic tendencies correlate with low geohelminth infection in free-ranging macaques.

Authors:  Cecile Sarabian; Andrew J J MacIntosh
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 7.  Parasite insight: assessing fitness costs, infection risks and foraging benefits relating to gastrointestinal nematodes in wild mammalian herbivores.

Authors:  Graeme Coulson; Jemma K Cripps; Sarah Garnick; Verity Bristow; Ian Beveridge
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  The effect of gastrointestinal nematode infection level on grazing distance from dung.

Authors:  Hizumi Lua Sarti Seó; Luiz Carlos Pinheiro Machado Filho; Luciana Aparecida Honorato; Bruna Fernanda da Silva; Alessandro Fernando Talamini do Amarante; Patrizia Ana Bricarello
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Faecal avoidance and selective foraging: do wild mice have the luxury to avoid faeces?

Authors:  Patrick T Walsh; Erin McCreless; Amy B Pedersen
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.844

10.  Modelling parasite transmission in a grazing system: the importance of host behaviour and immunity.

Authors:  Naomi J Fox; Glenn Marion; Ross S Davidson; Piran C L White; Michael R Hutchings
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.