Sit-to-stand motor strategies investigated in able-bodied young and elderly subjects.

For the execution of a certain motor task, a motor strategy is chosen by each individual among those that are consistent with the structural and functional constraints of his/her locomotor system, and that tends to maximise the effectiveness of the motor act. The identification of this strategy allows for the assessment of the individual's functional status. This study aimed at identifying the motor strategies adopted for the execution of the sit-to-stand motor task, at different speeds and initial postures, in a sample of 35 community-dwelling elders and in a sample of 16 young able-bodied individuals. This was done using a method, least perceivable to the test subject and "economical" for the experimenter, which entailed the recording of external forces only. A musculo-skeletal system model, based on a telescopic inverted-pendulum (TIP) moved by a linear and two rotational muscle-equivalent actuators, was then used. Parameters describing the kinematics and dynamics of these actuators were extracted and submitted to statistical analysis. Different motor strategies were identified in the two age groups, as well as associated with both a different initial posture (ankle dorsiflexion angle) and speed of execution of the motor task. In particular, the elder group, as compared with the young group, prior to seat-off tended to flex the trunk more, thus bringing the CM closer to the base of support, and at a higher velocity, thus gaining a higher momentum. After seat-off, elders rotated the body forward and, only after having brought their CM over the base of support, effectively started elevation. Both global muscular effort and coordination effort associated with the achievement of balance and raising were lower. However, maximal speed was also lower. The above results indicated that the elders could count on a lower functional reserve than the young individuals and, from the methodological viewpoint, that the TIP approach is a good candidate for subject-specific functional evaluation in a clinical context.