Literature DB >> 10854464

The effect of risk communication on risk perceptions: the significance of individual differences.

M Gerrard1, F X Gibbons, M Reis-Bergan.   

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to address the literature on the relation between risk communication and the initiation of health behavior change. More specifically, we examine the evidence that providing risk information is an effective way to change risk perceptions, as well as the more limited evidence that altering risk perceptions influences risk behavior. The paper discusses significant developments in the research on these issues, describes specific studies that represent trends in this research, and discusses methodologic issues important to the development of the field. Although there are relatively few studies that demonstrate causal links between risk communication and behavior change, recent developments in the field point to the importance of tailoring risk communications to the individual characteristics of targets. Such tailoring has taken a variety of forms, including providing individualized feedback concerning risk status or genetic vulnerability and assessing readiness for behavior change. Future intervention efforts should combine individualized risk status feedback with assessment of individual differences in previous behavior and acceptance of personal vulnerability.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10854464     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jncimonographs.a024217

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr        ISSN: 1052-6773


  12 in total

1.  Effects of personalized colorectal cancer risk information on laypersons' interest in colorectal cancer screening: The importance of individual differences.

Authors:  Paul K J Han; Christine W Duarte; Susannah Daggett; Andrea Siewers; Bill Killam; Kahsi A Smith; Andrew N Freedman
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2015-07-19

2.  Sexual behaviors among adults in Puerto Rico: a population-based study.

Authors:  Ana Patricia Ortiz; Marievelisse Soto-Salgado; Erick Suárez; María del Carmen Santos-Ortiz; Guillermo Tortolero-Luna; Cynthia M Pérez
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 3.802

3.  Patients do not have a consistent understanding of high risk for future fracture: a qualitative study of patients from a post-fracture secondary prevention program.

Authors:  J E M Sale; M A Gignac; G Hawker; D Beaton; L Frankel; E Bogoch; V Elliot-Gibson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-06-27       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Using family history information to promote healthy lifestyles and prevent diseases; a discussion of the evidence.

Authors:  Liesbeth Claassen; Lidewij Henneman; A Cecile J W Janssens; Miranda Wijdenes-Pijl; Nadeem Qureshi; Fiona M Walter; Paula W Yoon; Danielle R M Timmermans
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 3.295

5.  Perceptions of smoking-related risks and benefits as predictors of adolescent smoking initiation.

Authors:  Anna V Song; Holly E R Morrell; Jodi L Cornell; Malena E Ramos; Michael Biehl; Rhonda Y Kropp; Bonnie L Halpern-Felsher
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2008-12-23       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Computer-delivered tailored intervention improves colon cancer screening knowledge and health beliefs of African-Americans.

Authors:  Susan M Rawl; Celette Sugg Skinner; Susan M Perkins; Jeffrey Springston; Hsiao-Lan Wang; Kathleen M Russell; Yan Tong; Netsanet Gebregziabher; Connie Krier; Esther Smith-Howell; Tawana Brady-Watts; Laura J Myers; Deborah Ballard; Broderick Rhyant; Deanna R Willis; Thomas F Imperiale; Victoria L Champion
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2012-08-27

7.  How unrealistic optimism is maintained in the face of reality.

Authors:  Tali Sharot; Christoph W Korn; Raymond J Dolan
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2011-10-09       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 8.  A critical dialogue: communicating with type 2 diabetes patients about cardiovascular risk.

Authors:  Paris Roach; David Marrero
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2005

9.  Risk Communication and Factors Influencing Private Well Testing Behavior: A Systematic Scoping Review.

Authors:  Sarah K Colley; Peter K M Kane; Jacqueline MacDonald Gibson
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  The predictors of glucose screening: the contribution of risk perception.

Authors:  Pilar Lavielle; Niels Wacher
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 2.497

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.