Literature DB >> 10854184

Immunologic monitoring of clinical trials in patients with cancer: technology versus common sense.

T L Whiteside1.   

Abstract

Monitoring of CTL or helper T -cell responses to tumor antigens in the course of clinical trials is an essential and necessary component of specific immunotherapy of cancer. While a variety of new immunologic or molecular technologies are now available for measuring these responses at a single-cell level, none has been standardized or validated to meet this need. The clinical investigator is thus faced with a selection of a method that is most likely to meet the desirable objective of establishing a correlation between clinical and immunologic responses to biotherapy. Selection of a relevant assay for this purpose is not a trivial task. Furthermore, few immunologic techniques can be easily adapted to reliable serial monitoring of patients on clinical protocols. The ELISPOT assay performs well in this setting, allowing for tracking of antigen specific T cells in the peripheral blood of cancer patients who receive tumor vaccines. In our hands, this assay is sensitive, accurate and cost effective. Its reliable performance in the context of clinical vaccination trials is highly likely to provide information necessary for optimizing vaccine administration to cancer patients, including timing, route of delivery, antigen concentration and use of DC or other adjuvants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10854184     DOI: 10.3109/08820130009062299

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Immunol Invest        ISSN: 0882-0139            Impact factor:   3.657


  6 in total

1.  Evaluation of the interlaboratory concordance in quantification of human immunodeficiency virus-specific T cells with a gamma interferon enzyme-linked immunospot assay.

Authors:  A Samri; C Durier; A Urrutia; I Sanchez; H Gahery-Segard; S Imbart; M Sinet; E Tartour; J-P Aboulker; B Autran; A Venet
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2006-06

2.  Safety and immunological efficacy of a DNA vaccine encoding prostatic acid phosphatase in patients with stage D0 prostate cancer.

Authors:  Douglas G McNeel; Edward J Dunphy; James G Davies; Thomas P Frye; Laura E Johnson; Mary Jane Staab; Dorothea L Horvath; Jane Straus; Dona Alberti; Rebecca Marnocha; Glenn Liu; Jens C Eickhoff; George Wilding
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-07-27       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  A phase I study of dexosome immunotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Michael A Morse; Jennifer Garst; Takuya Osada; Shubi Khan; Amy Hobeika; Timothy M Clay; Nancy Valente; Revati Shreeniwas; Mary Ann Sutton; Alain Delcayre; Di-Hwei Hsu; Jean-Bernard Le Pecq; H Kim Lyerly
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2005-02-21       Impact factor: 5.531

4.  Resting of Cryopreserved PBMC Does Not Generally Benefit the Performance of Antigen-Specific T Cell ELISPOT Assays.

Authors:  Stefanie Kuerten; Helena Batoulis; Mascha S Recks; Edith Karacsony; Wenji Zhang; Ramu A Subbramanian; Paul V Lehmann
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 6.600

5.  Results and harmonization guidelines from two large-scale international Elispot proficiency panels conducted by the Cancer Vaccine Consortium (CVC/SVI).

Authors:  Sylvia Janetzki; Katherine S Panageas; Leah Ben-Porat; Jean Boyer; Cedrik M Britten; Timothy M Clay; Michael Kalos; Holden T Maecker; Pedro Romero; Jianda Yuan; W Martin Kast; Axel Hoos
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Immunother       Date:  2007-08-25       Impact factor: 6.968

6.  A modified human ELISPOT assay to detect specific responses to primary tumor cell targets.

Authors:  Anatoli Malyguine; Susan L Strobl; Kimberly A Shafer-Weaver; Tracy Ulderich; Angela Troke; Michael Baseler; Larry W Kwak; Sattva S Neelapu
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2004-03-29       Impact factor: 5.531

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.