Literature DB >> 10853803

The role of bone scanning in severe frostbite of the extremities: a retrospective study of 88 cases.

E Cauchy1, E Chetaille, M Lefevre, E Kerelou, B Marsigny.   

Abstract

We performed a retrospective study of the results of two-phase technetium-99m hydroxymethylene diphosphonate bone scans in 88 patients with severe frostbite of the extremities. All patients were evaluated within 48 h after rewarming and all underwent a first bone scan (BS1) within 5 days after rewarming (median, day 2) (group 1). An excellent correlation was found between absence of tracer uptake in the phalanges and later amputation; this correlation was especially strong during the bone phase of the scans (specificity = 0.99, sensitivity = 0.96, positive predictive value = 0.92). Normal or high uptake in the phalanges was a reliable indicator of ultimate healing (negative predictive value = 0.99). The sensitivity of the examination was enhanced by performing a second scan (BS2) more than 5 days (median, day 8) after rewarming (group 2, n = 36). A comparative analysis of BS1 and BS2 demonstrated that some of the lesions continued to evolve between day 2 and day 8. This suggests that the lesions could still be modified during this period. On the basis of the findings it is recommended that bone scan be performed close to day 2 in all patients who present with lesions extending proximally to include the entirety of one or more phalanges. In the case of severe sepsis, the results of the first bone scan, BS1, can serve as an indication for emergency amputation. BS2 should be performed close to day 8 only if there is an area of low or absent uptake on BS1. It is concluded that scintigraphy is an excellent means of evaluating patients with severe frostbite of the extremities: as early as day 2 after the injury it can indicate whether amputation is necessary, and between days 2 and 8 it provides valuable information on the efficacy of treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10853803     DOI: 10.1007/s002590050534

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0340-6997


  7 in total

Review 1.  Frostbite: Spectrum of Imaging Findings and Guidelines for Management.

Authors:  John D Millet; Richard K J Brown; Benjamin Levi; Casey T Kraft; Jon A Jacobson; Milton D Gross; Ka Kit Wong
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 5.333

2.  "Growing pains" in children are not associated with changes in vascular perfusion patterns in painful regions.

Authors:  Philip J Hashkes; Miguel Gorenberg; Victor Oren; Orit Friedland; Yosef Uziel
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2004-11-26       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 3.  The utility of bone scintigraphy with SPECT/CT in the evaluation and management of frostbite injuries.

Authors:  Matthew S Manganaro; John D Millet; Richard Kj Brown; Benjamin L Viglianti; Daniel J Wale; Ka Kit Wong
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 4.  Evaluation of bone viability.

Authors:  Isabel Roca; Ignasi Barber; Cesar G Fontecha; Francisco Soldado
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2013-03-24

5.  The Use of tPA in the Treatment of Frostbite: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Richard L Hutchison; Hannah M Miller; Spencer K Michalke
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2018-09-19

6.  Role of 99mTc MDP Bone Scan in Delineation of Ischaemic Zone in Cases of Severe Frostbite.

Authors:  Arun Ravi John; Anurag Jain; Braj Kishore; Aniruddha G Pandit
Journal:  Indian J Nucl Med       Date:  2017 Jul-Sep

7.  Cuscuta reflexa Roxb. Expedites the Healing Process in Contact Frostbite.

Authors:  Waseem Hassan; Manal Ali Buabeid; Umme Kalsoom; Sahar Bakht; Imran Akhtar; Furqan Iqbal; El-Shaimaa A Arafa
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-10-02       Impact factor: 3.411

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.