Literature DB >> 10853210

Tracheal intubation with the Macintosh laryngoscope versus intubating laryngeal mask airway in adults with normal airways.

S Kihara1, S Watanabe, N Taguchi, A Suga, J R Brimacombe.   

Abstract

We tested the hypothesis that haemodynamic changes to intubation and postoperative pharyngolaryngeal morbidity are similar for blind intubating laryngeal mask (ILM)-guided compared with laryngoscope-guided tracheal intubation in adults with normal airways. We also compared intubation success rates and airway complications. One-hundred and fifty paralysed, anaesthetized adult patients undergoing elective surgery were randomly assigned to one of three equal-sized groups: 1. blind intubation via the ILM using a straight, silicone tube; 2. intubation with a Macintosh laryngoscope using a straight silicone tube and 3. intubation with a Macintosh laryngoscope using a polyvinyl chloride tube (controls). A standard sequence of adjusting manoeuvres was followed if intubation was difficult. The number of adjusting manoeuvres and intubation attempts, time to intubation, intubation success rate (first attempt and within 3 min), haemodynamic changes (pre-induction, post-induction, post-intubation), oesophageal intubation, mucosal trauma (blood detected), hypoxia (SpO2 < 95%) and postoperative pharyngolaryngeal morbidity (double-blinded) were documented. Time to successful intubation was longer (57 vs 35 s), and more intubation attempts were required in the ILM group (P < 0.0001). The intubation success rate was 100% (all first attempt) for the laryngoscope groups and 94% (56% first attempt) for the ILM group. There were no significant differences in heart rate or blood pressure among groups. Oesophageal intubation (26 v 0%) and mucosal trauma (19 v 2%) were more common in the ILM group. Hypoxia and postoperative pharyngolaryngeal morbidity were similar among groups. Blind intubation through the ILM offers no advantages over the Macintosh laryngoscope for adult patients requiring intubation for elective surgery with normal airways, but it is a feasible alternative.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10853210     DOI: 10.1177/0310057X0002800305

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesth Intensive Care        ISSN: 0310-057X            Impact factor:   1.669


  10 in total

1.  Airway Scope: early clinical experience in 405 patients.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Hirabayashi; Norimasa Seo
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2008-02-27       Impact factor: 2.078

2.  Hemodynamic responses and upper airway morbidity following tracheal intubation in patients with hypertension: conventional laryngoscopy versus an intubating laryngeal mask airway.

Authors:  Elif Bengi Sener; Emre Ustun; Burcu Ustun; Binnur Sarihasan
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.365

3.  Better Hemodynamic Profile of Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertion Compared to Laryngoscopy and Tracheal Intubation.

Authors:  Hashem Jarineshin; Saeed Kashani; Majid Vatankhah; Alireza Abdulahzade Baghaee; Sahar Sattari; Fereydoon Fekrat
Journal:  Iran Red Crescent Med J       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 0.611

4.  Intubating condition, hemodynamic parameters and upper airway morbidity: A comparison of intubating laryngeal mask airway with standard direct laryngoscopy.

Authors:  J Kavitha; Debendra Kumar Tripathy; Sandeep Kumar Mishra; Gayatri Mishra; L J Chandrasekhar; P Ezhilarasu
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2011 Jan-Jun

5.  Tracheal intubation through SADs: Still blind when the ray of light available!

Authors:  Rakesh Garg; Pratishtha Yadav
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2022-01-06

6.  Comparison of SaCoVLM™ video laryngeal mask-guided intubation and i-gel combined with flexible bronchoscopy-guided intubation in airway management during general anesthesia: a non-inferiority study.

Authors:  Chun-Ling Yan; Yi-Qi-Yuan Zhang; Ying Chen; Zong-Yang Qv; Ming-Zhang Zuo
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2022-09-22       Impact factor: 2.376

7.  Endotracheal intubation through the intubating laryngeal mask airway (LMA-Fastrach™): A randomized study of LMA- Fastrach™ wire-reinforced silicone endotracheal tube versus conventional polyvinyl chloride tracheal tube.

Authors:  Megha U Sharma; Satinder Gombar; Kanti K Gombar; Baljit Singh; Nidhi Bhatia
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2013-01

8.  Air-Q intubating laryngeal airway: A study of the second generation supraglottic airway device.

Authors:  Viren Bhaskar Attarde; Nalini Kotekar; Sarika M Shetty
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2016-05

9.  Tracheal intubation through laryngeal mask airway CTrach™ with polyvinyl chloride tube: Comparison between two orientations of the tracheal tube.

Authors:  Karri Pavani; Handattu Mahabaleswara Krishna; Joseph Nandhini
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2017 Oct-Dec

10.  Study of Changes in Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter Following Tracheal Intubation Using Macintosh Laryngoscope or Fibreoptic-Guided Intubation Through Ambu Aura-I: A Randomised Controlled Study.

Authors:  Daljinder Singh; Akashdeep Singh; Ashim Sharma; Kuldip Sandhu
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-11-21
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.