Literature DB >> 10853177

Mechanical and histologic evaluation of Collagraft in an ovine lumbar fusion model.

W R Walsh1, J Harrison, A Loefler, T Martin, D Van Sickle, M K Brown, D H Sonnabend.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of a composite material composed of Type I bovine dermal collagen, 65% hydroxyapatite, and 35% tricalcium phosphate ceramic (Collagraft Bone Graft Matrix Strip NeuColl Incorporated, Palo Alto, CA) as a bone graft substitute for spinal fusion with and without the use of autologous bone marrow in an ovine lumbar spine model with pedicle screw fixation. Twenty-four adult sheep underwent a single level posterolateral (intertransverse process) L3-L4 lumbar fusion with one of three graft materials combined with rigid pedicle screw fixation. The three graft materials were Collagraft, Collagraft with marrow, and autogenous corticocancellous bone graft. Animals were euthanized 6 months after surgery and evaluated using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry, radiographs, histologic analysis, and mechanical testing. Dual energy xray absorptiometry between the transverse processes revealed that the mineral densities for the two Collagraft groups were significantly higher than the autogenous bone graft group. Histologic analysis confirmed that Collagraft was highly compatible and was well incorporated into the fusion mass. Both Collagraft groups had thick trabeculae and a mixture of lamellar and plexiform bone. The autogenous bone graft group had a smaller fusion complex, composed primarily of lamellar bone with thinner and fewer trabeculae. All three groups had similar mechanical properties. These results support the use of Collagraft in spinal fusion with pedicle screw fixation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10853177     DOI: 10.1097/00003086-200006000-00031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  6 in total

1.  Spinal fusion using an autologous growth factor gel and a porous resorbable ceramic.

Authors:  William R Walsh; Andreas Loefler; Sean Nicklin; Doug Arm; Ralph E Stanford; Yan Yu; Richard Harris; R M Gillies
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-03-18       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Preparation and in vitro investigation of chitosan/nano-hydroxyapatite composite used as bone substitute materials.

Authors:  Zhang Li; Li Yubao; Yang Aiping; Peng Xuelin; Wang Xuejiang; Zhang Xiang
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  Posterolateral spinal fusion in a rabbit model using a collagen-mineral composite bone graft substitute.

Authors:  William Robert Walsh; F Vizesi; G B Cornwall; D Bell; R Oliver; Y Yu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-05-28       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Critical Size Bone Defect Healing Using Collagen-Calcium Phosphate Bone Graft Materials.

Authors:  William Robert Walsh; Rema A Oliver; Chris Christou; Vedran Lovric; Emma Rose Walsh; Gustavo R Prado; Thomas Haider
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Osteogenic potentials of osteophytes in the cervical spine compared with patient matched bone marrow stromal cells.

Authors:  Pei Zhao; Weidong Ni; Dianming Jiang; Wei Xiong; Feng Li; Wei Luo
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.251

6.  A Comparative Study of Two Bone Graft Substitutes-InterOss® Collagen and OCS-B Collagen®.

Authors:  Gaurav Jain; Dylan Blaauw; Steve Chang
Journal:  J Funct Biomater       Date:  2022-03-09
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.