Literature DB >> 10853123

Comparison of stereotactic brain biopsy to interventional magnetic-resonance-imaging-guided brain biopsy.

W A Hall1, H Liu, A J Martin, C L Truwit.   

Abstract

Lesions within the brain are commonly sampled using stereotactic techniques. The advent of interventional magnetic resonance (MR) imaging now allows neurosurgeons to interactively investigate specific regions with exquisite visualization. We compared the safety and efficacy of this new surgical approach with stereotaxis. From February 1991 to June 1998, 134 stereotactic and 35 interventional MR-guided brain biopsies were performed. Stereotactic biopsies utilized preoperative scanning. Interactive scanning was used to confirm accurate positioning of the biopsy needle within the region of interest. Intraoperative pathologic examination of biopsy material was performed to verify the presence of diagnostic tissue in both biopsy groups. Intra- and postoperative MR imaging was obtained to exclude the presence of intraoperative hemorrhage. Recently, MR spectroscopic targeting has been utilized in 6 patients. In the stereotactic group, 129/134 (96%) biopsies were diagnostic. One patient had a transient hemiparesis after a brain stem biopsy and another suffered a fatal hemorrhage for a morbidity rate of 0.7% and a mortality rate of 0.7%. In reviewing 7,471 stereotactic biopsies, the morbidity was 3.5%, mortality 0.7% and diagnostic yield 91%. All 35 MR-guided brain biopsies were diagnostic (100%). MR spectroscopy was accurate in all cases in distinguishing recurrent tumor (5 cases) from radiation necrosis (1 case). One patient (3%) suffered a transient hemiparesis following a pontine biopsy and another patient (3%) developed a postoperative scalp cellulitis. No patient sustained a clinically or radiologically significant hemorrhage as determined by the immediate postbiopsy, intraoperative MR imaging. Interventional MR-guided brain biopsy is a safe and effective technique for evaluating lesions of the brain with morbidity and mortality rates comparable to those of stereotaxis. MR-guided biopsy appears to have a higher diagnostic yield than stereotaxis, which may reflect the ability to perform interactive, intraoperative scanning with that technique. Copyright 2000 S. Karger AG, Basel

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10853123     DOI: 10.1159/000029776

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stereotact Funct Neurosurg        ISSN: 1011-6125            Impact factor:   1.875


  4 in total

1.  Discrimination of paediatric brain tumours using apparent diffusion coefficient histograms.

Authors:  Jonathan G Bull; Dawn E Saunders; Christopher A Clark
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-09-15       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Usefulness of PET Imaging to Guide Treatment Options in Gliomas.

Authors:  Bogdana Suchorska; Nathalie Lisa Albert; Jörg-Christian Tonn
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 3.598

3.  PET imaging in the surgical management of pediatric brain tumors.

Authors:  Benoit Pirotte; Francesco Acerbi; Alphonse Lubansu; Serge Goldman; Jacques Brotchi; Marc Levivier
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2007-03-14       Impact factor: 1.532

4.  A Simple and Inexpensive Stereotactic Guidance Frame for MRI-Guided Brain Biopsy in Canines.

Authors:  Alexander D Squires; Yabiao Gao; Sean F Taylor; Marc Kent; Zion Tsz Ho Tse
Journal:  J Med Eng       Date:  2014-05-18
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.