Literature DB >> 10852275

A randomized, multicenter, controlled trial using intravenous pulses of methylprednisolone in the initial treatment of simple forms of giant cell arteritis: a one year followup study of 164 patients.

P Chevalet1, J H Barrier, P Pottier, G Magadur-Joly, M A Pottier, M Hamidou, B Planchon, D El Kouri, L Connan, J L Dupond, B De Wazieres, G Dien, E Duhamel, B Grosbois, P Jego, A Le Strat, J Capdeville, P Letellier, L Agron.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: (1) To evaluate the corticosteroid sparing effect of an initial intravenous (i.v.) pulse of methylprednisolone (MP) in the treatment of simple forms of giant cell arteritis (GCA). (2) To analyze corticosteroid response, steroid related side effects, and GCA complications.
METHODS: Patients received a 240 mg i.v. pulse of MP followed by 0.7 mg/kg/day oral prednisone (Group 1) or 0.7 mg/kg/day prednisone without an i.v. pulse (Group 2, controls), or a 240 mg i.v. pulse of MP followed by 0.5 mg/kg/day prednisone (Group 3). Corticosteroid dosage was reduced after normalization of 2 biological inflammatory variables to obtain half-dosage after 4 weeks in Groups 1 and 2 and 20 mg/day after 2 weeks in Group 3. Tapering was systematically attempted from the 6th month of treatment.
RESULTS: One hundred sixty-four patients were included in the trial (1992-96). Cumulative doses of corticosteroids after one year were identical for all groups (p = 0.39). No significant differences were observed in the time required for normalization of C-reactive protein, corticosteroid resistance (13.5%), and corticosteroid related side effects (39% of patients; p = 0.37). Corticosteroid resistant patients received larger doses and showed a high risk of GCA related complications (p = 0.02).
CONCLUSION: MP pulses have no significant longterm, corticosteroid sparing effects in the treatment of simple forms of GCA and should be limited to complicated forms. Moreover, corticosteroid resistance is a real risk factor for GCA complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10852275

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rheumatol        ISSN: 0315-162X            Impact factor:   4.666


  35 in total

Review 1.  Giant cell arteritis.

Authors:  J M Calvo-Romero
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.401

2.  Prednisolone combined with adjunctive immunosuppression is not superior to prednisolone alone in terms of efficacy and safety in giant cell arteritis: meta-analysis.

Authors:  M Yates; Y K Loke; R A Watts; A J MacGregor
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 3.  [Polymyalgia rheumatica: myalgic syndrome or occult vasculitis?].

Authors:  B Hellmich; W L Gross
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 0.743

Review 4.  EULAR recommendations for conducting clinical studies and/or clinical trials in systemic vasculitis: focus on anti-neutrophil cytoplasm antibody-associated vasculitis.

Authors:  Bernhard Hellmich; Oliver Flossmann; Wolfgang L Gross; Paul Bacon; Jan Willem Cohen-Tervaert; Loic Guillevin; David Jayne; Alfred Mahr; Peter A Merkel; Heiner Raspe; David G I Scott; James Witter; Hasan Yazici; Raashid A Luqmani
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2006-12-14       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 5.  [Current therapeutic options for giant cell arteritis].

Authors:  E Wipfler-Freissmuth; J Loock; F Moosig; C Dejaco; C Duftner; M Schirmer
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.372

Review 6.  Polymyalgia rheumatica and giant cell arteritis in older patients: diagnosis and pharmacological management.

Authors:  Jean Schmidt; Kenneth J Warrington
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 7.  The treatment of giant cell arteritis.

Authors:  J Alexander Fraser; Cornelia M Weyand; Nancy J Newman; Valérie Biousse
Journal:  Rev Neurol Dis       Date:  2008

8.  [Treatment of giant cell arteritis and polymyalgia rheumatica].

Authors:  L Horvath; B Hellmich
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.372

9.  Predictors of relapse and treatment outcomes in biopsy-proven giant cell arteritis: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Cristian Labarca; Matthew J Koster; Cynthia S Crowson; Ashima Makol; Steven R Ytterberg; Eric L Matteson; Kenneth J Warrington
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 7.580

Review 10.  Is ophthalmology evidence based? A clinical audit of the emergency unit of a regional eye hospital.

Authors:  T Y Y Lai; V W Y Wong; G M Leung
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.638

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.