Literature DB >> 10851129

In ovo time-lapse analysis after dorsal neural tube ablation shows rerouting of chick hindbrain neural crest.

P Kulesa1, M Bronner-Fraser, S Fraser.   

Abstract

Previous analyses of single neural crest cell trajectories have suggested important roles for interactions between neural crest cells and the environment, and amongst neural crest cells. To test the relative contribution of intrinsic versus extrinsic information in guiding cells to their appropriate sites, we ablated subpopulations of premigratory chick hindbrain neural crest and followed the remaining neural crest cells over time using a new in ovo imaging technique. Neural crest cell migratory behaviors are dramatically different in ablated compared with unoperated embryos. Deviations from normal migration appear either shortly after cells emerge from the neural tube or en route to the branchial arches, areas where cell-cell interactions typically occur between neural crest cells in normal embryos. Unlike the persistent, directed trajectories in normal embryos, neural crest cells frequently change direction and move somewhat chaotically after ablation. In addition, the migration of neural crest cells in collective chains, commonly observed in normal embryos, was severely disrupted. Hindbrain neural crest cells have the capacity to reroute their migratory pathways and thus compensate for missing neural crest cells after ablation of neighboring populations. Because the alterations in neural crest cell migration are most dramatic in regions that would normally foster cell-cell interactions, the trajectories reported here argue that cell-cell interactions have a key role in the shaping of the neural crest migration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10851129     DOI: 10.1242/dev.127.13.2843

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Development        ISSN: 0950-1991            Impact factor:   6.868


  23 in total

Review 1.  Control of neural crest cell behavior and migration: Insights from live imaging.

Authors:  Matthew R Clay; Mary C Halloran
Journal:  Cell Adh Migr       Date:  2010 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 2.  Regional differences in neural crest morphogenesis.

Authors:  Bryan R Kuo; Carol A Erickson
Journal:  Cell Adh Migr       Date:  2010 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 3.405

3.  Neuropilin-1 interacts with the second branchial arch microenvironment to mediate chick neural crest cell dynamics.

Authors:  Rebecca McLennan; Paul M Kulesa
Journal:  Dev Dyn       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.780

4.  Vertebrate head development: segmentation, novelties, and homology.

Authors:  Lennart Olsson; Rolf Ericsson; Robert Cerny
Journal:  Theory Biosci       Date:  2005-09-12       Impact factor: 1.919

Review 5.  Cell biology of embryonic migration.

Authors:  Satoshi Kurosaka; Anna Kashina
Journal:  Birth Defects Res C Embryo Today       Date:  2008-06

6.  Design and interpretation of cell trajectory assays.

Authors:  Lucie G Bowden; Matthew J Simpson; Ruth E Baker
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 4.118

7.  Early regulative ability of the neuroepithelium to form cardiac neural crest.

Authors:  Akouavi M Ezin; John W Sechrist; Angela Zah; Marianne Bronner; Scott E Fraser
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 3.582

Review 8.  Factors controlling cardiac neural crest cell migration.

Authors:  Margaret L Kirby; Mary R Hutson
Journal:  Cell Adh Migr       Date:  2010 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 3.405

9.  Multiple developmental mechanisms regulate species-specific jaw size.

Authors:  Jennifer L Fish; Rachel S Sklar; Katherine C Woronowicz; Richard A Schneider
Journal:  Development       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 6.868

Review 10.  Advanced optical imaging in living embryos.

Authors:  Christie A Canaria; Rusty Lansford
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2010-07-08       Impact factor: 9.261

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.