Literature DB >> 10850402

Goal-oriented, model-based drug regimens: setting individualized goals for each patient.

R Jelliffe1.   

Abstract

Serum drug concentrations have commonly been described in terms of therapeutic ranges within which most patients have a therapeutic effect and a low incidence of toxicity. However, truly individualized drug dosage regimens cannot be developed without first setting a specific individualized target goal, such as a target serum drug concentration, at a desired target time after the dose (usually at a peak or trough), for each patient. For example, it is well known that the dosage of digoxin, or of any drug with a narrow therapeutic range, should somehow be individualized. One can begin this process by considering each patient as an individual, with his/her own individual need for the drug. If the need is small, so is the upper acceptable risk of toxicity. This would lead to a gently regimen, adjusted to the patient's body weight and renal function, to best achieve that specific target goal. Alternatively, if previous therapy has not sufficed and a significant or urgent need exists, then a higher goal may justifiably be selected, a greater risk of toxicity accepted, and a dosage regimen developed to meet that greater need. After such an individualized target goal is chosen, it should be achieved as precisely as possible. After the regimen is given, serum levels need to be measured and an individualized, patient-specific pharmacokinetic model should be made. Without the model, with only the raw serum level data, one cannot perceive the important exchanges that occur between serum and nonserum compartments of the drug, and we lack the precision given by the combination of the assay and the model to evaluate properly, optimally, the patient's clinical sensitivity to the drug. These concepts have been discussed here for digoxin, but they are general and apply to all drugs. This approach has also been applied to therapy with aminoglycoside antibiotics, vancomycin, lidocaine, theophylline, antiviral agents, a variety of anesthetic agents, psychiatric drugs, and anticancer agents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10850402     DOI: 10.1097/00007691-200006000-00016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ther Drug Monit        ISSN: 0163-4356            Impact factor:   3.681


  8 in total

Review 1.  Therapeutic drug monitoring in the treatment of tuberculosis.

Authors:  Charles A Peloquin
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 2.  Paediatric models in motion: requirements for model-based decision support at the bedside.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Barrett
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Pharmacokinetics of aztreonam in healthy subjects and patients with cystic fibrosis and evaluation of dose-exposure relationships using monte carlo simulation.

Authors:  Alexander A Vinks; Ronald N van Rossem; Ron A A Mathôt; Harry G M Heijerman; Johan W Mouton
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2007-06-18       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Population modeling and Monte Carlo simulation study of the pharmacokinetics and antituberculosis pharmacodynamics of rifampin in lungs.

Authors:  Sylvain Goutelle; Laurent Bourguignon; Pascal H Maire; Michael Van Guilder; John E Conte; Roger W Jelliffe
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2009-04-20       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Digoxin Toxicity : Evaluation in Clinical Practice with Pharmacokinetic Correlations.

Authors:  K Lecointre; L Pisanté; F Fauvelle; S Mazouz
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.859

6.  The case for precision dosing: medical conservatism does not justify inaction.

Authors:  Marc H Scheetz; Thomas P Lodise; Kevin J Downes; George Drusano; Michael Neely
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 5.790

Review 7.  Optimizing Mycophenolic Acid Exposure in Kidney Transplant Recipients: Time for Target Concentration Intervention.

Authors:  David K Metz; Nick Holford; Joshua Y Kausman; Amanda Walker; Noel Cranswick; Christine E Staatz; Katherine A Barraclough; Francesco Ierino
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 4.939

8.  Integration of modeling and simulation into hospital-based decision support systems guiding pediatric pharmacotherapy.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Barrett; John T Mondick; Mahesh Narayan; Kalpana Vijayakumar; Sundararajan Vijayakumar
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2008-01-28       Impact factor: 2.796

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.