Literature DB >> 10850266

Resin composites in the post-amalgam age.

F Lutz1, I Krejci.   

Abstract

Resin-based composites are now being used as either amalgam substitutes or amalgam alternatives for the direct placement of box-shaped, stress-bearing restorations in posterior teeth. The expected longevity of these restorations is 8 years. With amalgam substitutes, preservation of enamel and dentin and restoration of tooth form and function must be warranted for the full length of the envisaged service life. In addition, with amalgam alternatives, the restoration must be, and must remain, imperceptible at a normal talking distance. The limiting factor with amalgam substitutes is the elevated risk of secondary caries, which is a result of the marginal openings that are unavoidably associated with the nature of the operative technique. Restorations in permanent teeth using amalgam substitutes most likely fail in some critical aspect of the Swiss Dental Society quality guidelines. With amalgam alternatives, the high cost and the demanding operative technique remain the main criticisms. However, amalgam alternatives, if they are placed using a sophisticated operative technique resulting in perfectly adapted restorations, meet the high expectations outlined in the Swiss Dental Society quality guidelines and fit the clinical concept of the post-amalgam age.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10850266

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Compend Contin Educ Dent        ISSN: 1548-8578


  5 in total

1.  Adhesive analysis of voids in Class II composite resin restorations at the axial and gingival cavity walls restored under in vivo versus in vitro conditions.

Authors:  John H Purk; Vladimir Dusevich; Alan Glaros; J David Eick
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2006-09-06       Impact factor: 5.304

2.  Proximal direct composite restorations and chairside CAD/CAM inlays: marginal adaptation of a two-step self-etch adhesive with and without selective enamel conditioning.

Authors:  T Bortolotto; I Onisor; I Krejci
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2006-10-10       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Clinical evaluation of two packable posterior composites: 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  T C Fagundes; T J E Barata; E Bresciani; D F G Cefaly; M F F Jorge; M F L Navarro
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2006-07-06       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 4.  Direct composite resin fillings versus amalgam fillings for permanent posterior teeth.

Authors:  Helen V Worthington; Sara Khangura; Kelsey Seal; Monika Mierzwinski-Urban; Analia Veitz-Keenan; Philipp Sahrmann; Patrick Roger Schmidlin; Dell Davis; Zipporah Iheozor-Ejiofor; María Graciela Rasines Alcaraz
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-08-13

5.  Bulk filling of Class II cavities with a dual-cure composite: Effect of curing mode and enamel etching on marginal adaptation.

Authors:  Jose Bahillo; Tissiana Bortolotto; Miguel Roig; Ivo Krejci
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2014-12-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.