Literature DB >> 10849526

Prospective randomized clinical trial comparing high-dose ifosfamide + GM-CSF vs high-dose cyclophosphamide + GM-CSF for blood progenitor cell mobilization.

J Vela-Ojeda1, F Tripp-Villanueva, L Montiel-Cervantes, E Sánchez-Cortés, M Ayala-Sánchez, M E Guevara-Moreno, L D García-León, A Rosas-Cabral, M A Esparza, J González-Llaven.   

Abstract

Between August 1994 and June 1999, 56 patients were prospectively randomized to receive ifosfamide 10 g/m2 + GM-CSF 5 microg/kg/day (IFO+GM-CSF n = 28) and cyclophosphamide 4 g/m2 + GM-CSF 5 microg/kg/day (CY+GM-CSF n = 28). Both groups were comparable for age, gender, diagnosis, disease stage and previous chemotherapy. The IFO+GM-CSF group demonstrated a shorter median interval between therapy and apheresis (10 days (8-14) vs 13 days (8-25) P = 0.002), median number of doses of GM-CSF (9 (7-13) vs 15 (9-31) P = 0.001), median of days with aplasia (0.5 (0-10) vs 6 (0-21) P = 0.001), median days with fever (0 (0-6) vs 3 (0-9) P = 0.006) and median of days using i.v. antibiotics (0 (0-11) vs 7.5 (0-19) P = 0.002). The median MNC yield was similar in both groups. The CD34+ cell yield was better in the CY+GM-CSF group (3.14 (0.9-11.8) vs 5.33 (0. 08-32)) but not at significant levels (P = 0.1). White blood cell hematopoietic recovery was more rapid in the CY+GM-CSF group (16 (10-22) vs 13 (10-24) P = 0.02). Platelet engraftment was similar in both groups. Costs of mobilization and transplantation were almost the same: $28 570 ($18 527-$47 028) and $30 020 ($17 281-$67 591), respectively (P = 0.9). There were no differences in disease-free survival and overall survival between both groups. Mild and transient non-hematological toxicity (hemorrhagic cystitis, decrease in serum creatinine clearance and CNS dysfunction) was seen most frequently in the IFO+GM-CSF group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10849526     DOI: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1702426

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant        ISSN: 0268-3369            Impact factor:   5.483


  5 in total

Review 1.  Barriers to generalizability of health economic evaluations in Latin America and the Caribbean region.

Authors:  Federico Augustovski; Cynthia Iglesias; Andrea Manca; Michael Drummond; Adolfo Rubinstein; Sebastián García Martí
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Pharmacokinetics and metabolism of ifosfamide in relation to DNA damage assessed by the COMET assay in children with cancer.

Authors:  I Willits; L Price; A Parry; M J Tilby; D Ford; S Cholerton; A D J Pearson; A V Boddy
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2005-05-09       Impact factor: 7.640

3.  High-dose versus low-dose cyclophosphamide in combination with G-CSF for peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization.

Authors:  Jin Seok Ahn; Seonyang Park; Seock-Ah Im; Sung-Soo Yoon; Jong-Seok Lee; Byoung Kook Kim; Soo-Mee Bang; Eun Kyung Cho; Jae Hoon Lee; Chul Won Jung; Hugh Chul Kim; Chu Myung Seong; Moon Hee Lee; Chul Soo Kim; Keun Seok Lee; Jung Ae Lee; Myung-Ju Ahn
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.884

4.  Efficacy of hematopoietic stem cell mobilization regimens in patients with hematological malignancies: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Chengxin Luo; Guixian Wu; Xiangtao Huang; Yali Zhang; Yanni Ma; Yarui Huang; Zhen Huang; Hui Li; Yu Hou; Jieping Chen; Xi Li; Shuangnian Xu
Journal:  Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 6.832

5.  Oxazaphosphorines combined with immune checkpoint blockers: dose-dependent tuning between immune and cytotoxic effects.

Authors:  Nathalie Chaput; Angelo Paci; Julia Delahousse; Charles Skarbek; Mélanie Desbois; Jean-Luc Perfettini
Journal:  J Immunother Cancer       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 13.751

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.