Literature DB >> 10848793

Conditioning regimens in autologous stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma: a comparative study of efficacy and toxicity from the Spanish Registry for Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma.

J J Lahuerta1, J Martinez-Lopez, C Grande, J Bladé, J de la Serna, A Alegre, J García-Laraña, D Caballero, A Sureda, J de la Rubia, A M Alvarez, J Marín, A Escudero, E Conde, K Perez-Equiza, J C García Ruiz, J M Moraleda, A León, J Bargay, R Cabrera, M T Hernandez-García, J Diaz-Mediavilla, J S Miguel.   

Abstract

High-dose chemoradiotherapy conditioning regimens for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) are generally held to give similar results in multiple myeloma (MM), but no specific comparative study has been published. We addressed this issue by comparing the main high-dose chemoradiotherapy regimens used in the Spanish Registry. Patient cohorts included 315 cases treated with 200 mg/m2 melphalan (MEL200), 127 patients with 140 mg/m2 melphalan plus total body irradiation (MEL140 + TBI) and 121 cases with 12 mg/kg busulphan plus 140 mg/m2 melphalan (BUMEL). After ASCT, granulocyte and platelet recovery time was similar in all conditioning groups. There were no differences in transplant-related mortality. All regimens yielded a similar response in reference to pre-ASCT MM status, although BUMEL produced a slightly better overall response when compared with the other regimens (97% vs. 89% and 92%, P = 0.003). The 5-year overall survival (OS) with BUMEL was 47% [95% confidence interval (CI) 26-68] compared with 43% (CI 31-54) for MEL140 + TBI and 37% (CI: 18-56) for MEL200. The median survival for the BUMEL group was 64 months compared with 45 and 37 months for the MEL200 and MEL140 + TBI groups respectively. These differences were non-significant (P = 0.2). The median event-free survival (EFS) was better for BUMEL (32 months) than for MEL200 (22 months) or for MEL140 + TBI (20 months). The differences in EFS between BUMEL and the other conditioning regimens reached statistical significance (P = 0.01). Nevertheless, the adjusted multivariate analysis for OS and EFS revealed that the conditioning regimens had no independent prognostic value. We concluded that three different conditioning regimens, commonly used for ASCT in MM, have a similar antimyeloma effect. However, the trend for better results observed in our series with BUMEL requires a prospective trial.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10848793     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.2000.01979.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Haematol        ISSN: 0007-1048            Impact factor:   6.998


  13 in total

1.  Intensified conditioning regimen has only limited value for patients with progressive multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Naoki Takezako; Akiyoshi Miwa; Akira Tanimura; Chiho Inokuchi; Tateki Shikai; Noboru Yamagata; Atsushi Togawa
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.490

2.  Arsenic trioxide with ascorbic acid and high-dose melphalan: results of a phase II randomized trial.

Authors:  Muzaffar H Qazilbash; Rima M Saliba; Yago Nieto; Gaurav Parikh; Matteo Pelosini; Fatima B Khan; Roy B Jones; Chitra Hosing; Floralyn Mendoza; Donna M Weber; Michael Wang; Uday Popat; Amin Alousi; Paolo Anderlini; Richard E Champlin; Sergio Giralt
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Total marrow irradiation: a new ablative regimen as part of tandem autologous stem cell transplantation for patients with multiple myeloma.

Authors:  George Somlo; Ricardo Spielberger; Paul Frankel; Chatchada Karanes; Amrita Krishnan; Pablo Parker; Leslie Popplewell; Firoozeh Sahebi; Neil Kogut; David Snyder; An Liu; Timothy Schultheiss; Stephen Forman; Jeffrey Y C Wong
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  Intravenous busulfan plus melphalan is a highly effective, well-tolerated preparative regimen for autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with advanced lymphoid malignancies.

Authors:  Partow Kebriaei; Timothy Madden; Reza Kazerooni; Xuemei Wang; Peter F Thall; Celina Ledesma; Yago Nieto; Elizabeth J Shpall; Chitra Hosing; Muzaffar Qazilbash; Uday Popat; Issa Khouri; Richard E Champlin; Roy B Jones; Borje S Andersson
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2010-07-30       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Intravenous BU plus Mel: an effective, chemotherapy-only transplant conditioning regimen in patients with ALL.

Authors:  P Kebriaei; T Madden; X Wang; P F Thall; C Ledesma; M de Lima; E J Shpall; C Hosing; M Qazilbash; U Popat; A Alousi; Y Nieto; R E Champlin; R B Jones; B S Andersson
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2012-06-25       Impact factor: 5.483

6.  A phase II, single-arm, prospective study of bendamustine plus melphalan conditioning for second autologous stem cell transplantation in de novo multiple myeloma patients through a tandem transplant strategy.

Authors:  M Martino; G Tripepi; G Messina; I D Vincelli; G Console; A G Recchia; M Gentile; S Molica; F Morabito
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 5.483

7.  Busulfan 12 mg/kg plus melphalan 140 mg/m2 versus melphalan 200 mg/m2 as conditioning regimens for autologous transplantation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients included in the PETHEMA/GEM2000 study.

Authors:  Juan José Lahuerta; Maria Victoria Mateos; Joaquin Martínez-López; Carlos Grande; Javier de la Rubia; Laura Rosiñol; Anna Sureda; José García-Laraña; Joaquín Díaz-Mediavilla; Miguel T Hernández-García; Dolores Carrera; Joan Besalduch; Felipe de Arriba; Albert Oriol; Lourdes Escoda; Javier García-Frade; Concepción Rivas-González; Adrían Alegre; Joan Bladé; Jesús F San Miguel
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2010-07-27       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 8.  Breakthroughs in the management of multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Leonard T Heffner; Sagar Lonial
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 9.546

9.  Conditioning with busulfan plus melphalan versus melphalan alone before autologous haemopoietic cell transplantation for multiple myeloma: an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial.

Authors:  Qaiser Bashir; Peter F Thall; Denái R Milton; Patricia S Fox; Jitesh D Kawedia; Partow Kebriaei; Nina Shah; Krina Patel; Borje S Andersson; Yago L Nieto; Ben C Valdez; Simrit Parmar; Gabriela Rondon; Ruby Delgado; Chitra Hosing; Uday R Popat; Betul Oran; Stefan O Ciurea; Pei Lin; Donna M Weber; Sheeba K Thomas; Hans C Lee; Elisabet E Manasanch; Robert Z Orlowski; Loretta A Williams; Richard E Champlin; Muzaffar H Qazilbash
Journal:  Lancet Haematol       Date:  2019-03-22       Impact factor: 30.153

10.  Total marrow irradiation as part of autologous stem cell transplantation for Asian patients with multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Shih-Chiang Lin; Pei-Ying Hsieh; Pei-Wei Shueng; Hui-Ju Tien; Li-Ying Wang; Chen-Hsi Hsieh
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-09-08       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.