Literature DB >> 10847536

Healing following GTR treatment of bone defects distal to mandibular 2nd molars after surgical removal of impacted 3rd molars.

S Karapataki1, A Hugoson, C F Kugelberg.   

Abstract

AIM: The purpose of this study was to study the healing, following guided tissue regeneration (GTR) treatment, of bone defects distal to mandibular 2nd molars (M2s) after surgical removal of impacted mesioangularly or horizontally inclined third molars (M3s) in patients > or = 25 years.
METHOD: 20 patients with bilateral soft tissue impacted M3s were included in the split-mouth study. The 2 sites to be treated in each patient were randomised before the 1st operation as to which would undergo the test procedure and which would be the control site. After surgical removal of M3 at test sites, a resorbable polylactic acid (PLA) barrier was attached to M2 to cover the post-surgical bone defect. The flap was then replaced and sutured to cover the barrier. Control sites underwent the same procedure, as did the test sites, with the exception that no barrier was placed. The clinical examinations performed were oral hygiene pre- and 12 months postoperatively and probing pocket depth 12 months postoperatively. The alveolar bone level (ABL) at the distal surface of the M2, as determined from radiographs taken at suture removal and 12 months postsurgery, was chosen to be the primary response variable.
RESULTS: Most bone defects showed healing up to 10%-20% of the tooth length at both test and control sites. 2 test and 2 control sites showed no improvement in the bone level. The mean values of bone healing registered in mm from the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) were 2.6 +/- 2.19 SD and 3.0 +/- 2.20 SD for test and control sites, respectively. Different factors affecting the healing result are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10847536     DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.2000.027005325.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Periodontol        ISSN: 0303-6979            Impact factor:   8.728


  5 in total

1.  Determinants of alveolar ridge preservation differ by anatomic location.

Authors:  Binnaz Leblebicioglu; Mabel Salas; Yirae Ort; Ashley Johnson; Vedat O Yildiz; Do-Gyoon Kim; Sudha Agarwal; Dimitris N Tatakis
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 8.728

2.  Platelet-Rich Fibrin for Hard- and Soft-Tissue Healing in Mandibular Third Molar Extraction Socket.

Authors:  Deborah Sybil; Madhuri Sawai; Mohammad Faisal; Sanjay Singh; Vanshika Jain
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2020-06-08

3.  Autologous Dentin Graft after Impacted Mandibular Third Molar Extraction to Prevent Periodontal Pocket Formation-A Split-Mouth Pilot Study.

Authors:  Giulia Mazzucchi; Marco Lollobrigida; Luca Lamazza; Giorgio Serafini; Dario Di Nardo; Luca Testarelli; Alberto De Biase
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 3.623

4.  Retrospective comparative clinical study for silk mat application into extraction socket.

Authors:  Ju-Won Kim; You-Young Jo; Jwa-Young Kim; Ji-Hyeon Oh; Byoung-Eun Yang; Seong-Gon Kim
Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2019-04-12

5.  Use of Collagen Membrane in the Treatment of Periodontal Defects Distal to Mandibular Second Molars Following Surgical Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars: A Comparative Clinical Study.

Authors:  C Burnice Nalina Kumari; Thiagarajan Ramakrishnan; Pradeep Devadoss; Rajaram Vijayalakshmi; Khalid J Alzahrani; Mazen A Almasri; Manea Musa Al-Ahmari; Hajar Saeed Al Dira; Malath Suhluli; Ashok Kumar Bhati; Zeeshan Heera Ahmad; A Thirumal Raj; Shilpa Bhandi; Shankargouda Patil
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-18
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.