Literature DB >> 10847375

Do picture archiving and communication systems improve report turnaround times?

A Mehta1, K Dreyer, G Boland, M Frank.   

Abstract

Radiology departments are beginning to embrace new technologies to decrease operating budgets and improve services. One of these technologies is the picture archiving and communication system (PACS). PACS, through immediate availability of images to the radiologist, promises to decrease turnaround times of reports to the clinician. The purpose of this study was to determine if this technology actually decreases the time for referring clinicians to receive reports generated by the radiologist. The time to provide a preliminary report by a resident and time to finalize this report by a board-certified radiologist was retrospectively obtained for 6,022 abdominal and pelvic computed tomography (CT) scans over two 1-year periods from March 1, 1997 to March 1, 1998 and from March 1, 1998 to March 1, 1999. During the first year, interpretation was conducted using hard-copy film and during the second using PACS. In both 1-year periods, MedSpeak voice recognition software (IBM, White Plains, NY) was employed for dictation. The average time for a preliminary report for a abdominal and pelvic CT, dictated by a resident or fellow, to be available in alphanumeric form on the hospital information system using hard-copy film was 3.73 days. The installation of a PACS system decreased this turnaround time to 0.56 days, representing an 85.0% improvement. The time to availability of final reports, ie, signed by board-certified staff radiologists, was 5.49 days in the hard-copy interpretation subset and 5.97 days in the PACS subset. The addition of PACS into an academic gastrointestinal radiology division improves availability of alphanumeric preliminary reports of abdominal and pelvic CTs on the hospital information system (HIS), dictated by a resident or fellow, by 85.0%. There was no impact with a PACS on the time to final sign reports by a staff board certified radiologist as signing patterns remained relatively constant over the two interpretation formats.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10847375      PMCID: PMC3453287          DOI: 10.1007/bf03167637

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  2 in total

1.  Prospective study of a PACS: information flow and clinical action in a medical intensive care unit.

Authors:  H L Kundel; S B Seshadri; C P Langlotz; P N Lanken; S C Horii; C F Nodine; M Polansky; E Feingold; I Brikman; M Bozzo; R Redfern
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 2.  Review article: some cost-benefit considerations for PACS: a radiological perspective.

Authors:  N H Strickland
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 3.039

  2 in total
  13 in total

1.  Impact of electronic signature on radiology report turnaround time.

Authors:  Luigi Lepanto
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2003-12-15       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  From traditional reading rooms to a soft copy environment: radiologist satisfaction survey.

Authors:  Lori L Rumreich; Annette J Johnson
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2003-12-15       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Speech recognition interface to a hospital information system using a self-designed visual basic program: initial experience.

Authors:  Edward C Callaway; Clifford F Sweet; Eliot Siegel; John M Reiser; Douglas P Beall
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2002-04-30       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Impact of PACS on dictation turnaround time and productivity.

Authors:  Luigi Lepanto; Guy Paré; David Aubry; Pierre Robillard; Jacques Lesage
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  The radiology digital dashboard: effects on report turnaround time.

Authors:  Matthew B Morgan; Barton F Branstetter; David M Lionetti; Jeremy S Richardson; Paul J Chang
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2007-03-03       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  Voice recognition dictation: radiologist as transcriptionist.

Authors:  John A Pezzullo; Glenn A Tung; Jeffrey M Rogg; Lawrence M Davis; Jeffrey M Brody; William W Mayo-Smith
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.056

7.  Process modification and emergency department radiology service.

Authors:  Robert DeFlorio; Bret Coughlin; Ryan Coughlin; Haiping Li; John Santoro; Bridget Akey; Michael Favreau
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2008-07-30

8.  Introducing PACS to the late majority. A longitudinal study.

Authors:  Petter Hurlen; Truls Østbye; Arne Borthne; Pål Gulbrandsen
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2008-11-01       Impact factor: 4.056

9.  Does improved access to diagnostic imaging results reduce hospital length of stay? A retrospective study.

Authors:  Petter Hurlen; Truls Østbye; Arne S Borthne; Pål Gulbrandsen
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-09-06       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Effect of Implementation of Picture Archiving and Communication System on Radiologist Reporting Time and Utilization of Radiology Services: A Case Study in Iran.

Authors:  Najmeh Hasani; AghaFatemeh Hosseini; Abbas Sheikhtaheri
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 4.056

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.