Literature DB >> 10845898

Quality of life-adjusted survival analysis of high-dose therapy with autologous bone marrow transplantation versus sequential chemotherapy for patients with aggressive lymphoma in first complete remission. Groupe d'Etude les Lymphomes de l'Adulte (GELA).

N Mounier1, C Haioun, B F Cole, C Gisselbrecht, C Sebban, P Morel, G Marit, R Bouabdallah, C Ravoet, G Salles, F Reyes, E Lepage.   

Abstract

Evaluating high-dose therapy (HDT) with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in term of both duration and quality of life (QOL) presents major interests for patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma. The quality-adjusted time without symptom and toxicity (Q-TWiST) methodology was applied to the LNH87-2 trial comparing HDT with ASCT versus sequential chemotherapy in 541 patients in first complete remission (CR). Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) curves were used to estimate duration of 4 health states: acute short-term toxicity (Tox1), secondary toxicity (Tox2), time without symptom and toxicity (TWiST), and relapse (Rel). Areas under survival curves (AUC) were retrospectively weighted according to QOL coefficients. HDT increased, but not significantly, TWiST (+2. 4 months in AUC, P =.17) and decreased Rel (-3 months, P <.01). Survival estimates did not differ between the 2 treatments (AUC 47.7 months for OS, 39.7 months for DFS). High-risk patients treated by HDT versus chemotherapy had a significant benefit in DFS (AUC 28.8 versus 24.9 months, P <.01) but not in OS (AUC 37.3 versus 36 months, P =.27). Sensitivity analysis, performed by varying QOL coefficients, demonstrated significant quality-adjusted survival gain in high-risk patients treated by HDT. In low-risk patients, a diagram provided an aid to clinical decision-making. This analysis supports the use of HDT in these patients with adverse prognostic factors in the first CR, even after adjusting for QOL using the Q-TWiST method. (Blood. 2000;95:3687-3692)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10845898

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood        ISSN: 0006-4971            Impact factor:   22.113


  6 in total

Review 1.  Aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: economics of high-dose therapy.

Authors:  Stephen M Beard; Lucy Wall; Louise Gaffney; Fiona Sampson
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  Integration of PKPD relationships into benefit-risk analysis.

Authors:  Francesco Bellanti; Rob C van Wijk; Meindert Danhof; Oscar Della Pasqua
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 3.  Analyzing oncology clinical trial data using the Q-TWiST method: clinical importance and sources for health state preference data.

Authors:  Dennis A Revicki; David Feeny; Timothy L Hunt; Bernard F Cole
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Survival-weighted health profile for long-term survivors of acute myelogenous leukemia.

Authors:  Chiun Hsu; Jung-Der Wang; Jing-Shiang Hwang; Hwei-Fang Tien; Shueh-Mei Chang; Ann-Lii Cheng; Yao-Chang Chen; Jih-Luh Tang
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 5.  High-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation in the first line treatment of aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) in adults.

Authors:  A Greb; J Bohlius; D Schiefer; G Schwarzer; H Schulz; A Engert
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-01-23

6.  A quality-adjusted survival time without symptoms or toxicities analysis of glasdegib plus low-dose cytarabine versus low-dose cytarabine as initial therapy for acute myeloid leukemia in patients who are not considered candidates for intensive chemotherapy.

Authors:  Caitlyn T Solem; Timothy J Bell; Youngmin Kwon; Joseph C Cappelleri; Courtney Johnson; Helen Bhattacharyya; Caroline J Hoang; Jorge E Cortes
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 6.860

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.