Literature DB >> 10845265

Use of unconventional methods of therapy by cancer patients in Pakistan.

I A Malik1, N A Khan, W Khan.   

Abstract

Most of the studies related to the use of unconventional methods of therapy by cancer patients have been carried out in the developed countries. This study was conducted to ascertain the frequency, type, and duration of use of unconventional methods of therapy by cancer patients in Pakistan. We also wanted to identify individuals who are most likely to use these methods and to compare the findings with those reported from the developed countries. Between 1 April and 30 May 1994, all patients with histologically proven cancer who visited the oncology unit were interviewed. A printed questionnaire with questions and options was used as an interview guide. Informed consent was obtained. One hundred and ninety-one patients were interviewed, on average, for 25 minutes each. Use of unconventional methods of therapy by cancer patients was widespread (54.5% of all patients). The majority (83.7%) were influenced by family members to use these methods. Traditional herbal medicines (70.2%) and homeopathy (64.4%) were the most commonly employed methods. Thirty-six percent of the users employed these methods before receiving any conventional therapy. Only 15% used these methods after conventional therapeutic options had been exhausted. Patients generally perceived these methods as useful, non-toxic and inexpensive. Age, marital status, socio-economic background, education level and status of underlying neoplasm did not influence the frequency of use of unconventional methods. The use, however, was influenced by gender, family size, and type of underlying malignancy. Patients aware of their diagnosis were less likely to use these methods. This study suggests that use of unconventional methods by cancer patients in Pakistan is widespread. Unlike western countries, these methods are often employed before receiving any conventional therapy. This probably results in a significant delay which can be expected to adversely influence the subsequent disease management and survival. Public education, reduction of cost and easy availability of conventional therapy may be helpful in reducing the use of methods which otherwise may have no proven value.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10845265     DOI: 10.1023/a:1007621104789

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0393-2990            Impact factor:   8.082


  19 in total

1.  The Cochrane Collaboration and evidence-based complementary medicine.

Authors:  B M Berman
Journal:  J Altern Complement Med       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.579

2.  The physician and unorthodox cancer therapies. The American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Communication with cancer patients. Experiences in Pakistan.

Authors:  I A Malik; A F Qureshi
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1997-02-20       Impact factor: 5.691

4.  [Tumor patients and alternative medicine. Attempt at characterizing users of alternative treatment methods in oncology].

Authors:  D P Berger; R Obrist; J P Obrecht
Journal:  Dtsch Med Wochenschr       Date:  1989-03-03       Impact factor: 0.628

5.  A survey of unproven cancer remedies and their users in an outpatient clinic for cancer therapy in Finland.

Authors:  P J Arkko; B L Arkko; O Kari-Koskinen; P J Taskinen
Journal:  Soc Sci Med Med Psychol Med Sociol       Date:  1980-12

6.  The prevalence of questionable methods of cancer treatment in the United States.

Authors:  I J Lerner; B J Kennedy
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  1992 May-Jun       Impact factor: 508.702

7.  Cancer patients' insight into their treatment, prognosis, and unconventional therapies.

Authors:  R N Eidinger; D V Schapira
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1984-06-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Unconventional medicine in the United States. Prevalence, costs, and patterns of use.

Authors:  D M Eisenberg; R C Kessler; C Foster; F E Norlock; D R Calkins; T L Delbanco
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-01-28       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  [Use of Q10 in cancer patients].

Authors:  A Damkier; A B Jensen; C Rose
Journal:  Ugeskr Laeger       Date:  1994-02-07

10.  [Alternative treatments in cancer; extent and background of utilization].

Authors:  N van der Zouwe; F S van Dam; N K Aaronson; G J Hanewald
Journal:  Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd       Date:  1994-02-05
View more
  6 in total

1.  Prevalence of traditional, complementary, and alternative medicine use by cancer patients in low income and lower-middle income countries.

Authors:  Jacob Hill; Coleman Mills; Quefeng Li; Jennifer S Smith
Journal:  Glob Public Health       Date:  2018-10-16

2.  Why breast cancer patients seek traditional healers.

Authors:  Mazanah Muhamad; Sharan Merriam; Norhasmilia Suhami
Journal:  Int J Breast Cancer       Date:  2011-11-17

Review 3.  Systematic reviews of complementary therapies - an annotated bibliography. Part 3: homeopathy.

Authors:  K Linde; M Hondras; A Vickers; G ter Riet; D Melchart
Journal:  BMC Complement Altern Med       Date:  2001-07-20       Impact factor: 3.659

4.  Patient Delay in Breast Cancer Diagnosis in Two Hospitals in Karachi, Pakistan: Preventive and Life-Saving Measures Needed.

Authors:  Uzma Shamsi; Shaista Khan; Iqbal Azam; Shaheryar Usman; Amir Maqbool; Tiffany Gill; Romaina Iqbal; David Callen
Journal:  JCO Glob Oncol       Date:  2020-06

5.  Traditional and complementary medicine use among cancer patients in Nepal: a cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Soo Jeung Choi; Sangita Karki Kunwor; Hyea Bin Im; Jung Hye Hwang; Dain Choi; Dongwoon Han
Journal:  BMC Complement Med Ther       Date:  2022-03-15

6.  Use of complementary and alternative medicine by cancer patients at the University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital, Enugu, Nigeria.

Authors:  Emmanuel R Ezeome; Agnes N Anarado
Journal:  BMC Complement Altern Med       Date:  2007-09-12       Impact factor: 3.659

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.